Because US District Judge Vince Chhabra hasn’t yet reached a decision in the Lyft settlement, it’s back to the drawing board. Scherwin thinks that Lyft might be looking at data again in terms of damages and exposure to avoid more risks of litigation. “The judge says that damages such as overtime are a lot more than Lyft’s proposed $12.2 million, and the company may not win so they will likely come back with a more realistic damage model,” he says.
Scherwin thinks that Lyft may have inflated its damage analysis. If the company can come up with more money and strengthen its argument to the judge, it may be successful. Of course if it litigates, there is a chance it gets nothing - it’s a gamble for both sides.
“Obviously it’s hard to predict that outcome, but in my opinion, Lyft drivers are independent contractors,” Scherwin adds. “I think a good example of someone who meets the definition of an independent contractor - within the law - is someone who has the type of control over their work hours and has the ability to earn more or less money. Before this lawsuit was filed, employment attorneys, myself included, would use Lyft and Uber as a model to define an independent contractor.”
READ MORE CALIFORNIA OVERTIME LEGAL NEWS
“In three or four months, there will probably be another motion in front of the court to approve a settlement but this is far from over,” says Scherwin. “Regardless of the next motion, I am sure the judge will have lots of questions. All of us are very interested in any ruling or settlements. Almost any business wants to know who it can have as individual contractor or employee, even if they don’t realize it now.”
The Lyft lawsuit is Cotter v. Lyft Inc., 13-cv-04065, US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco). The Uber case is O’Connor v. Uber Technologies Inc., 13-cv-03826 US District Court, Northern District of California (San Francisco).