Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Revel Systems to Settle California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit for $2.75 Million

. By

Inside sales reps pocket overtime of $248 to $53,240

Oakland, CAThe District Court for the Northern District of California has approved a settlement in a class action California unpaid wages lawsuit. In the lawsuit, Bisaccia v. Revel Systems, a group of inside sales representatives claim that Revel Systems, Inc. (Revel) failed to pay overtime wages as required under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Under the terms of the settlement, a group of 149 plaintiffs will share a total of $2.75 million.

All in a day’s work



Revel sells a cloud-based Point of Sale (POS) system. Restaurants, retail stores and other enterprises throughout the world use it because, in part, it integrates with Apple’s iPad. The POS system tracks sales, inventory and includes payroll and customer relationship management features.

Joseph Bisaccia worked for Revel as a Sales Executive out of Revel’s office in Tempe, Arizona where he cold-called potential buyers. Revel also provided him with leads to follow in an effort to make sales. Revel employs many inside sales representatives to work in a similar capacity.

High pressure sales quotas, no overtime



Between 2014 and 2017, Bisaccia and other sales reps claim that they were pressured to meet ambitious monthly sales goals that could not be achieved within the limits of a 40-hour workweek. He worked, on average, two to six hours of overtime every week. In addition, he and other plaintiffs typically worked overtime hours on weekends, either from Revel’s office or from home, where they took and made calls to potential customers. It was nonstop hustle.

Revel routinely provided meals to inside sales representatives so that they could work through lunch breaks. In addition, the company required inside salespersons to work overtime during the last week of each month in order to meet the company’s sales quotas. For example, during the workweek ending on October 30, 2016, Bisaccia estimated that he worked 55 hours. He was, however, not compensated for any of the overtime hours he worked in that week or in any previous workweek.

Instead, Revel misrepresented to the sales representatives that they were exempt from minimum wage and overtime protections under FLSA. Rather than pay Bisaccia and other inside salespersons one and one-half times their regular hourly rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a given workweek, Revel paid only the regular hourly rate. During the period of time in question, the company kept no records of actual hours worked.

Are inside sales employees protected by overtime laws?



As a general principle, the FLSA requires employers to pay an overtime premium of one and a half times the employee’s regular rate for all hours worked in excess of 40 within a workweek and to also pay at least the minimum wage for all hours worked. However, the law also establishes certain exceptions to these requirements. The workers not protected by overtime laws are referred to as ”exempt.”

The legal issue in many overtime lawsuits is whether a job fits within one of those exceptions. If not, then an employer must comply with the FLSA minimum wage and overtime requirements. Commissioned sales employees seem to present a particular puzzle to employers.

Inside salespeople are those who do not leave the office to make sales. These are the workers who try to make sales over the telephone, internet or by mail. They know the “click” of the dreaded auto dialer. They are generally covered by overtime protections.

Outside salespeople customarily work away from the employer’s place of business. They have more control over their time and conditions of employment and are usually not entitled to earn overtime.

Whether a worker is an inside or an outside salesperson depends on the job duties performed, rather than a particular title. A common mistake many employers make is to treat all commissioned salespeople as exempt employees. It may be a particularly tempting to do so because not having to pay overtime may save an employer on payroll.

Why is the overtime settlement important?



This is not one of those situations that makes new law. Although the determination of whether an employee works in an inside sales capacity or an outside sales capacity can be very fact-specific, the law is not new or unclear. Nonetheless, violations of this provision of the FLSA remain quite common.

Commissioned salespeople who usually work from their employer’s place of business and do the hard work of cold-calling and following employer-provided leads to sell the employer’s goods or services are likely entitled to be paid overtime for hours beyond a 40-hour workweek. The settlement in Bisaccia is a reminder of this basic rule.

READ ABOUT CALIFORNIA UNPAID WAGES LAWSUITS

California Unpaid Wages Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an employment law lawyer who may evaluate your California Unpaid Wages claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help Now
Sponsored by Aequitas Legal Group
Advertisement

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free