Lawyers and Settlements
Home Page >> Lawsuits Filed >> Lawsuit: Merck Faces Implanon Migration Class Action Lawsuit

Merck Faces Implanon Migration Class Action Lawsuit

A birth control lawsuit has been filed against Merck and it’s subsidiary Organon, over allegations that its Implanon birth control device migrates through the body, becoming irretrievable and exposing women who have had the device implanted to a continuing risk of potential side effects.

Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2006, Implanon is a small, toothpick sized implant that is placed just under the skin in a woman’s upper arm. It is designed to release the progestin etonogestrel to prevent pregnancy over a three-year period. An estimated 500,000 American women have had the birth control implant inserted.

In 2011, officials in the UK reported that nearly 600 women had indicated that they got pregnant even with the birth control device. Similar concerns have been raised in the US by women who have undergone the implant.

The Implanon class action lawsuit is brought by Brook Reynolds, Robert Reynolds, Julie Reynolds, Jenni Akins, Major Akins and Ruby Ginns.

Brook Reynolds and her parents joined the lawsuit after Brook received an Implanon implant in her left arm in May 2012. In July 2014, when she went to have it removed, her physician was unable to locate it. To date, the device has still not been located in Brook’s body and is therefore irretrievable, putting her at unavoidable risk for health side effects connected with the device roaming through her body, including ectopic pregnancy and vascular damage.

Similarly, Ruby Ginns and Jenni Akins who had implants inserted in 2012, outline virtually identical stories to those of Brook Reynolds.

According to the complaint, the women and their family members claim that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn that the devices could migrate and become irretrievable.

Specifically, the complaint asserts that Merck and Organon manufactured and designed a defective medical device, failure to warn, strict liability, negligence, fraud by concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of warranty, infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. The lawsuit seeks both punitive and compensatory damages. Merck Faces Implanon Migration Class Action Lawsuit Over Migration Injury Pending Against Against

Implanon Birth Control Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated on


Implanon Reviews Could Steer Women Away From the Birth Control Device
Implanon Reviews Could Steer Women Away From the Birth Control Device Santa Cruz, CA:Women seeking a long-term birth control solution have probably heard about the implantable birth control device Implanon. However, if they somehow missed the news of Implanon lawsuits and rely on reviews at online health forums, what they find may steer those women away from using Implanon [READ MORE]

Young Mother Recounts Horrid Experience with Birth Control Implant
Young Mother Recounts Horrid Experience with Birth Control Implant Kenilworth, NJ: Her name is Lexi and she’s a young mother with a five-month-old baby who recounts in a YouTube video what turned out to be a horrid experience with Nexplanon birth control. Nexplanon, an implantable birth control device, is essentially the same product as Implanon birth control, only with the addition of barium sulfate to aid in locating the device for removal once the birth control device is depleted, usually after the third year [READ MORE]

Problems with Implantable Birth Control Removal Known Since 1994
Problems with Implantable Birth Control Removal Known Since 1994 Washington, DC: It’s been 10 years since Implanon birth control, the implantable device that lasts up to four years (three years on-label), was given formal approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Twelve years before that, a research paper described the difficulty in extracting the six capsules inherent to a Norplant implantable birth control system. Over the intervening time from 1994 to the present day, a period of 23 years, concern has been raised over such implantable devices, the difficulty involved in device removal and the potential for device migration [READ MORE]


Posted by
sarah adams
After implanon i cant get pregnant


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Request Legal Help

First name:

Last name:

Email address:

Phone number(s):

Zip/Postal Code:

Describe your complaint:

By submitting this form I agree to the Terms of Service.
There is no cost to submit this form.
I would like to be interviewed by a journalist.
Subscribe to our free weekly newsletter.

Check Claim Status Advertise with us Legal Funding

Related Lawsuits

Legal Services:


FAQ | TOS | Privacy | Disclaimer | About Us | Contact Us | Press | Advertise | Member Login | Site Map | View Mobile Website

American Bar Association - Proud Member   Better Business Bureau   CAALA   Best of the Web Approved   Public Justice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License © 2001-2017 Online Legal Media. All rights reserved.

Visit other Online Legal Media Websites:
Get Legal Help