Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Implanon Lawsuits Still in Court One Year After FDA Warning Label Update

. By
Washington, DCMarch 2017 marked the one-year anniversary of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) update of the warning label of the popular implantable birth control device Implanon to include risks of device migration.

Implanon is a matchstick-sized rod containing a birth control drug that is inserted by a medical professional into the patient's arm. The device is supposed to be effective for three years.

However, in March 2016, the FDA updated Implanon's label to include a safety warning that there have been reports of the medical device migrating from the arm to other parts of the body.

According to the 2016 FDA safety label update:

"There have been reports of migration of the implant within the arm from the insertion site, which may be related to deep insertion. There also have been post-marketing reports of implants located within the vessels of the arm and the pulmonary artery, which may be related to deep insertions or intravascular insertion.

"In cases where the implant has migrated to the pulmonary artery, endovascular or surgical procedures may be needed for removal."

Prior to the FDA's update, various lawsuits were filed by women who allegedly suffered side effects related to migration of the Implanon device.

In April 2015, Kayla Doherty filed a federal lawsuit Kayla Doherty v. Merck & Co. Inc. et al Case No. 1:15-cv-00129, US District Court, District of Maine against Merck & Co. Inc. in the US District Court of Maine, alleging that she gave birth to a healthy baby boy 18 months after a health care center staffer performed a procedure to insert the implantable birth control device into her arm.

When Doherty became pregnant, a nurse informed her that a clinic doctor believed that the device was never inserted, according to court documents. Both Implanon and the similar device Nexplanon have records of failed insertion attempts because of defectively designed applicators, according to Doherty's lawsuit.

Two other women also filed a lawsuit Brook Reynolds et al v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Case No. 3:15-cv-397, Northern District of Ohio, Western Division against Merck in March 2015, alleging that their Implanon devices migrated after insertion.


That lawsuit is pending.

READ ABOUT IMPLANON LAWSUITS

Implanon Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your IMPLANON claim at no cost or obligation.

READER COMMENTS

Posted by

on
I've gotten my implanon implant placed in may 2010 and it had moved in June 2010 and it was do to be removed in may 2013 but cojld not be located .I had several ultrasounds and other procedures done to try to locate the device but I had no luck at all .on January 11 2017 I was hospitalized and diagnosed with pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis and was placed on blood thinners and I remained in hospital for a week I contacted the drug manufacturing company about this matter but they said that they don't believe that the implant caused the harm but I had a few other diagnosed that were related to thus implant as well .please get back to me as soon as possible .Thank u

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free