Request Legal Help Now - Free

Essure Cases Can Proceed in California

. By
Santa Clara, CAA decision issued on the consolidated California Essure cases, on August 2nd, will allow the claims of 14 women who believe they were injured by Essure to proceed against the manufacturer, Bayer. This ruling will improve the prospects for recovery of thousands of women alleging they were seriously injured by their use of Essure.

Hailed as the next generation of contraception, Essure consists of implantable coils that are permanently inserted via a catheter into the fallopian tubes, to prevent pregnancy. It has been on the market since 2002. Thousands of women across the US have had the coils implanted, and subsequently joined support groups on social media to discuss the side effects and medical problems they believe are caused by the device. The most common side effects include pain, hemorrhaging, headaches, menstrual irregularities, weight fluctuation, device migration and suspected nickel allergy. Some women have reportedly had a hysterectomy or other procedures to remove coils.

The decision, by Judge Winifred Y. Smith in Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, found that the women’s claims were not expressly or impliedly pre-empted under federal or state law. Bayer claimed immunity, asserting the plaintiffs, and similarly situated women, are barred from bringing claims against it due to federal pre-emption law, because Essure is a Class III medical device that was approved by the FDA in 2002, and therefore immune from lawsuits brought by the victims of the device.

Judge Smith rejected Bayer's request for immunity, instead finding that the Plaintiffs could proceed with the causes of action related to: Bayer's alleged failure to adequately warn the FDA, and thereby the public, of Essure's potential dangers and adverse side effects; and claims that Bayer breached Essure's warranties and misrepresented Essure's safety and efficacy through advertising and promotional materials that were not approved by the FDA.

In February 2016, the FDA announced it will require Bayer to conduct a clinical study, implement a patient decision checklist to make sure potential users of Essure understand the risks of the product, and add a black box warning to Essure's labeling. A black box warning is the FDA's highest warning level and indicates that a product may cause serious injuries or death.


Essure Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about
Request Legal Help Now! - Free