Hair loss is a normal byproduct of chemotherapy as a treatment for a variety of cancers. Hair, in most cases grows back within a reasonable period of time following the conclusion of chemotherapy. With Taxotere (docetaxel), however, it is alleged that hair does not grow back. Plaintiffs also allege that had they been aware of the potential for permanent hair loss, they would have chosen an alternative form of cancer treatment.
The Court overseeing Taxotere multidistrict litigation (In Re: Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation – MDL No. 2740) dealt with various orders pertaining to the submission of Master Complaints, and Short Form Complaints to the Court, together with various inherent deadlines.
It was reported that in an effort to streamline the process, plaintiffs filing Taxotere alopecia lawsuits with the Court on, or after April 1 of this year do so by utilizing the Short Form Complaint. Ditto for litigants already with lawsuits on the books prior to April 1st, who now would have the opportunity to file a Short Form Complaint as an Amended complaint to be received by May 31 of this year.
In sum, the Master Complaint will deal exclusively with the allegations common to all Taxotere hair loss lawsuits in the MDL, while the Short Form Complaint will break out certain complaints from the Master Complaint as they relate to individual plaintiffs.
READ MORE TAXOTERE HAIR LOSS LEGAL NEWS
Yet plaintiffs hold that manufacturer Sanofi knew by the late 1990s that permanent hair loss was possible.
In an unrelated lawsuit, Sanofi (and Aventis Pharmaceuticals before it) has been accused of unlawfully marketing Taxotere for unapproved uses. Sanofi had tried to dodge the allegations, made under the False Claims Act. However the judge in the case dismissed the petition, and the long-running lawsuit continues.
The case is US ex rel. Yoash Gohil v. Aventis Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al., Case No. 2:02-cv-02964, in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.