Many Uncompensated for Time Preparing and Finishing Work
Many companies require employees to wear safety gear, carry out employment-related tasks or attend brief meetings off-the-clock. These requirements are the focus of lawsuits, alleging employees should be paid for the time spent donning and doffing special gear for work, as well as time spent in pre- and post-production work activities. For employees who carry out these activities upon arrival or departure on a daily basis, the extra time can add up to a lot of uncompensated work.
FREE UNPAID WAGES LAWSUIT EVALUATION
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Donning and Doffing Lawsuits
In various donning and doffing lawsuits, the courts have found in favor of employees. These include a 2012 US Supreme Court ruling against a poultry processor required the employer to pay employees for time spent putting on and taking off required safety gear at the start and the finish of their shift. In issuing its decision, the Supreme Court found certain activities should be paid for if they are essential to the work being done.
In the case of safety gear, employees benefit by not being exposed to workplace hazards; however, employers also benefit by paying less for employee sick time. According to plaintiffs, employees should either be given the necessary time to don and doff work gear as part of their workday or they should be compensated for time spent dressing and undressing for work. A donning and doffing lawsuit typically seeks unpaid overtime, as the time spent donning and doffing safety gear or a uniform adds time to the work week in excess of 40 hours.
Hotel and restaurant workers, as well as hospital and healthcare workers, are all usually required as terms of their employment to wear a uniform. As such, donning and doffing lawsuits can be prevalent in those industries as well. A 2008 employment class action lawsuit filed against the Hilton LAX included allegations that hotel workers were not paid for the time it took to put on and take off their uniforms. The Hilton LAX settled the lawsuit for $2.5 million.
Even police officers and firefighters may, unwittingly, be the victims of a donning and doffing lawsuit. A lawsuit on behalf of Los Angeles Police Department officers was found in favor of the plaintiffs because donning and doffing a police uniform--complete with holsters and bullet-proof vests--can add an additional 5 to 15 minutes before and after a police officer's shift.
Call Center Lawsuits
Furthermore, some call centers are accused of automatically clocking their employees out at the end of their shifts, even if the employees are in the middle of a phone call and not allowed to hang up on the customer. In other words, the employee is performing job duties but not being paid for those tasks.
Lawsuits have been filed against various call centers alleging employees are forced to perform job-related tasks off-the-clock.
One lawsuit has been filed against Sykes Enterprises, alleging employees were required to log into several secure servers prior to their shifts and after breaks, but were not able to clock in for their shifts until the set up process was finished, despite laws requiring employees be paid from the start of their first principal activity of the workday. The lawsuit also alleges employees were automatically clocked out at the end of their designated shifts, even if the employee was still taking a call. Employees then allegedly finished up their calls without being paid.
Meanwhile, a lawsuit has been filed against SEI Enterprises alleging employees were not properly compensated for all time worked, including duties related to their job such as logging into and out of various computer systems two to three times per shift. The time spent logging into and out of computer systems allegedly took between eight and ten minutes per session. According to the lawsuit, employees were not allowed to clock in for their shifts until the logging in process was complete.
Amazon Unpaid Wages Lawsuit
Donning and Doffing Lawsuits
Additionally, some industries may require that an employee use a company car during work. The time the employee takes to retrieve the car at the beginning of the workday, and to return the company car at the end of the workday, may not be time that is compensated. Use of a company car in which getting the car and returning it are not compensated may be a wage and hour violation.
Unpaid Wages: Time Required for Work Legal HelpIf you or a loved one has suffered losses due to Unpaid Wages from work required at arrival or departure, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an Employment lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated on
- Tennessee Labor lawsuits alleging violations of Tennessee labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination, harassment and more.
- California Unpaid Wages alleging employees spend unpaid time putting on and taking off specialized uniforms or carrying out activities that are required for their jobs
- Sykes Call Center Unpaid Wages Lawsuit
- Call Center Wage and Hour Lawsuits
- Massachusetts Labor lawsuits alleging violations of Massachusetts labor laws including overtime pay, discrimination, harassment and more.
California McDonald’s Workers Cite COVID-19 Safety Issues
The Gig Economy v. Assembly Bill 5
- California Sues Uber and Lyft
- Some California Food Workers Choose between COVID-19 exposure or lost wages—will worker safety lawsuits follow?
- California Suspends Worker Layoff Notifications. Did Velodyne Take Advantage?
- Can California Employers Pay Workers with Reloadable Debit Cards?
- California Labor Bill AB5 Adding Fuel to Fire with COVID-19 Crisis?