Request Legal Help Now - Free


Attorney Hopes "Discretionary Proof" Suit will Clean Up the Insurance Industry

. By
Detroit, MIDetroit attorney John Conway has stepped up to the plate many times on behalf of clients whose disability claims have been denied. Recently he launched a national class action on behalf of Sun Life Canada policyholders who allege their claims have been unfairly and illegal adjudicated under the company's discretionary proof clause.

The discretionary proof clause means "the insurer will only pay the claim if Sun Life Canada is satisfied that you have a disability that prevents you from working," explains Conway. The discretionary proof clause contained in the Sun Life Canada disability insurance contracts not only puts the company in a conflict of interest position, it also essentially gives insurers "licence to steal."

"They are not only deciding the claim, they are insuring the claim," says Conway. "It comes out of their assets—every dollar they pay out to claimants is a dollar lost to them."

In June 2007, the state of Michigan outlawed discretionary proof clauses in disability contracts, yet Sun Life Canada has continued to impose the clause on claims like the one filed by the lead plaintiff in the class action, Reyna Allen.

Allen worked on an assembly line in pharmaceutical manufacturing plant in Detroit and was required to stand for long periods of time. A back injury combined with spinal defect made it impossible to continue in her job.

"All the doctors say she is disabled," says Conway. "All the documents say she has this medical condition." But Sun Life adjudicators told Allen that they did not believe she had provided them with satisfactory proof that she was unable to work.

It is safe to say that Allen is not the only Sun Life Canada policyholder whose claim was rejected under the discretionary proof clause since 2007. Potential class members include any Sun Life Canada policyholder whose contract was written in the state of Michigan and whose claim was denied under the discretionary proof clause.

Conway, a veteran attorney, says he believes Sun Life has been "brazen" about defying the law because there are no penalties for doing so in this situation.

"The only thing claimants can hope for is to get their benefits plus interest, which is now at a point and half," says Conway. "I think only the under threat that all of their claims are going to have to re-adjusted or compensated is Sun Life Canada going to pay.

"This claim going to clean up the industry a little. At least, that's what we hope."

John J. Conway is a solo practice in Detroit, Michigan. He is a hold a JD from the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law and BA from Marquette University in Milwaukee. He has been an attorney for more than a decade and deals in a wide variety of litigation.



If you have suffered losses in this case, please send your complaint to a lawyer who will review your possible [DISABILITY INSURANCE Lawsuit] at no cost or obligation.


Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free