Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Supreme Court Ruling Affects Stockbroker Arbitration

. By
Washington, DCA recent ruling from the US Supreme Court could have an impact on stockbroker arbitration and claims of stock fraud. The ruling, which came down in KPMG LLP v. Cocchi, involved situations where only some of the claims in a suit are subject to arbitration. Courts considering cases of stock fraud arbitration and stockbroker fraud will now have to determine each claim separately when determining whether or not the case can go to arbitration.

According to the Supreme Court's finding, the courts must consider each claim in a lawsuit separately when determining arbitrability. Furthermore, the courts cannot simply deny an arbitration because some of the claims are non-arbitrable. In other words, if some, but not all, of the claims in an arbitration are arbitrable, then the arbitration can continue.

The case made its way to the Supreme Court after a lawsuit was filed against KPMG LLP in state court, asserting negligent misrepresentation, consumer fraud, and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty. At issue was whether several of the claims were or were not subject to the arbitration clause in KPMG's contract. Although some claims were arbitrable, two of the four claims were not, and the trial court reportedly denied arbitration.

The Supreme Court, however, found that if there are multiple claims in a dispute and some are arbitrable, those that are arbitrable must be sent to arbitration. The case was then sent back to lower court to determine whether the remaining two claims in the KPMG lawsuit are subject to the arbitration clause.

"A court may not issue a blanket refusal to compel arbitration merely on the grounds that some of the claims could be resolved by the court without arbitration," the justices wrote in the decision, which was handed down November 7, 2011.

According to court documents, those who filed the initial lawsuit were limited partners in a group of funds known as the Rye Funds. Those funds were reportedly invested with Bernard Madoff and allegedly lost millions of dollars. Lawsuits were also filed against the Rye Funds and the Funds' managers. The lawsuit against KPMG alleged the company failed to use proper auditing standards for the partnerships' financial statements.

For investors, this means that if they file a stockbroker arbitration or claim against a financial firm, their case must be sent to arbitration if some of the claims involved are found to be subject to arbitration. Even if some of the claims are not subject to arbitration, the courts cannot dismiss the case outright.

READ ABOUT STOCK BROKER LAWSUITS

Stock Broker Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a securities fraud lawyer who may evaluate your Stock Broker claim at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free