Request Legal Help Now - Free


UBS Puerto Rico Closed-End Funds Lose $1.66 Billion Last Year

. By
New York, NYThe numbers are in and it gives pause to consider the motivation of those considering a UBS Puerto-Rico Closed-End Funds lawsuit: the funds lost a total of $1.66 billion in the first nine months of 2013.

Investment News (1/13/14) reports that the nail in the coffin, as it were, for UBS Financial Services and its portfolio of municipal closed-end funds came in July of last year when the City of Detroit filed for bankruptcy protection. That’s when the market bottomed out for the funds, and for Puerto Rico’s municipal debt, which is valued at $70 billion.

In various lawsuits, UBS Financial Services is accused of failing to disclose the true nature of the risk to investors. There are also allegations that products were sold to investors for whom such products made little sense financially or from a position of risk tolerance. The allegation is of shareholder fraud.

Investment News reports that UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico remains a major player in the municipal debt for the commonwealth, with 70 percent of the portfolios for the funds invested in Puerto Rican securities. According to the report, proprietary closed-end bond funds were packed up and sold in the 10 years beginning in 2002, and were valued at $10 billion over that time.

According to financial blogger Edward S. O’Neal, a principal with Securities Litigation & Consulting Group (SLCG), the percentage losses for the worst-performing UBS Puerto Rico Closed-End Funds ranged from 38 to 48 percent. The expert later said in an interview that overconcentration of assets in the securities of two Puerto Rico municipal issuers - The Employees Retirement System of the Government of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its Instrumentalities, and the Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation - represented the biggest component of the losses.

According to O’Neal, under Puerto Rican rules diversified funds can invest no more than five percent of a portfolio in a single issuer, with non-diversified funds limited to hold no more than 25 percent in a single issuer. However, UBS is reported to have lobbied the Puerto Rican government to waive those rules and allow for a higher ceiling and thus, higher concentrations.

A spokesperson for UBS, Gregg Rosenberg, flatly denied that assertion.

“The funds are required to hold at least 67 percent of their assets in Puerto Rico assets, including Puerto Rico municipal bonds, in order to maintain their tax-advantaged status for retail investors,” Rosenberg wrote in an e-mail to Investment News. “The temporary relief obtained by the funds and inaccurately cited by SLCG waives the 67 percent requirement, thereby permitting the funds to reduce their concentrations in Puerto Rico bonds.”

Rosenberg went on to point out that recent losses notwithstanding, the UBS Puerto Rico Closed-End Funds have historically performed well - and that the dramatic losses in the latter part of 2013 were the result of the decline in the Puerto Rico municipal bond market.

O’Neal writes that the Standard & Poor’s Municipal Bond Puerto Rican Index fell 17 percent during the first nine months of 2013.

However, those investors thinking in terms of potential shareholder fraud will best remember the headline and the number: $1.66 billion. Most, but not all of the funds, were sold to citizens of Puerto Rico, so the losses are concentrated there. And regardless of where an investor is located, the age of the investor will impact whether or not there is time to make up those losses before the funds need to be accessed for retirement.

Such is the impetus for a securities lawsuit, in order an attempt to claim damages and reverse the losses incurred.


UBS Closed End Funds Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a securities fraud lawyer who may evaluate your UBS Closed End Funds claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

The UBS Puerto Rico funds are sold only to Puerto Rico residents. They where selling at huge premiums over NAV for many years now. Many up to 20% premium over NAV, and UBS mantained an artificcial stability in the market value, because they controlled the market. They where THE market! Those funds aren't traded on exchanges, only sold "Over The Counter" and many times charging 3-4% commissions without disclosing that to clients. How can an fund pay $20 million in dividends and have only $10 million in earnings? Only distributing capital. More that 50% of UBS's profits in the US Territory came from the sale of this funds. And churning was the order of the day.


Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free