Request Legal Help Now - Free


Another Monsanto Roundup Lawsuit filed in California

. By

A Sacramento resident has filed a Roundup lawsuit In California State Court against Monsanto claiming his decades-long use of its Roundup product caused his non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers.

San Francisco, CAMonsanto has been hit with another lawsuit claiming its Roundup product causes non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and other cancers. Plaintiff Michael Langford of Sacramento was diagnosed with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in 2007 and later developed other cancers. Langford’s Monsanto lawsuit filed in late June comes on the heels of a claim also filed in June. An Ohio resident filed suit in Delaware Superior Court claiming her non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was also the result of many years’ exposure to Roundup in the care of her home garden.

Roundup Retailer

Langford also names agricultural products firm Wilbur-Ellis, a San Francisco-based company that markets and distributes agricultural and industrial products, including Roundup and other herbicides throughout California. According to Forbes, Wilbur-Ellis is one of America's largest private companies, with over $3 billion in revenue. Langford purchased Roundup at a hardware store near his home supplied by Wilbur-Ellis.

Monsanto Failure to Warn

Langford sprayed Roundup around his 5.5 acre property since 1985 to control weeds and insects. As well, in his job as building inspector supervising large construction projects in Northern California he was also exposed to Roundup.  Although he was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in 2007, Langford continued to regularly used Roundup up until 2019 – evidence of Monsanto’s failure to warn.

Langford also alleges negligence, design defect, and negligent misrepresentation and/or fraud, among other claims, against Monsanto, a St. Louis-based agrochemical business owned since 2018 by conglomerate Bayer.

According to the complaint, Monsanto owes Roundup’s success to a “focused campaign of deception, aimed at deflecting and undermining both scientific and anecdotal reports that the herbicide was a danger to humans and animals and would, directly contrary to the company’s claims, build up in and leach into soil and groundwater.” Further, the company paid for independent tests of Roundup that resulted in finding the product benign and in at least two cases, lab executives were indicted and convicted of fraud and/or data falsification in their testing of agrochemicals.

The lawsuit states, “Since Monsanto began selling Roundup, the company has misrepresented its safety… Monsanto knew that glyphosate could pose significant risks to human health, including a risk of causing cancer. This lawsuit seeks to hold Monsanto accountable for this misconduct…Monsanto’s global success at marketing and selling Roundup was accompanied by a focused campaign of deception, aimed at deflecting and undermining both scientific and anecdotal reports that the herbicide was a danger to humans and animals and would, directly contrary to the company’s claims, build up in and leach into soil and groundwater. “ The complaint asserts that Monsanto sponsored allegedly independent tests of Roundup that, not surprisingly, found the product benign; in at least two cases, executives of those labs were indicted and convicted of fraud and/or data falsification in their testing of agrochemicals.

Current research indicates that non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) can have a latency period (the time between initial exposure to a carcinogen and diagnosis of the disease) of 10 to 20 years or more. And a study in the British Journal of Cancer gives the 5-year relative survival rate for NHL in England and Wales at about 46% for patients diagnosed in the late 1980s, and has improved by about 4% every 5 years since. NHL is a cancer with long-established links to glyphosate in which abnormal growth of white blood cells can produce tumors throughout the body.

In a press release, Langford’s attorney said, “Over the years since Roundup was introduced, Monsanto appears to have spent as much time and energy on misinformation, denial, and concealment of the facts as it did on the development of this weed-killer. After decades of distortions about its star money-making product, the company is finally considering changes to the labels on Roundup. Unfortunately, that is far too little and too late for many people, including Michael Langford.”

It went on: “With the demise last month of a court-supervised national class litigation to handle plaintiffs’ claims regarding Roundup, Bayer and Monsanto announced a five-point plan to attempt to contain legal action. It may include relabeling Roundup products to exclude references to safety, and an associated website with links to studies and other information on use of Roundup. The Company also appear to be assessing the future of glyphosate products in the U.S. residential market. Bayer has set aside a reported $10 billion to cover the cancer claims of tens of thousands of people.”

Langford seeks damages for pain and suffering and physical impairment, as well as punitive and exemplary damages and other expenses. The mass tort complaint is Case number CGC21592238 was filed in the Superior Court of California for San Francisco County on June 15.


Roundup Cancer Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a defective products lawyer who may evaluate your Roundup Cancer claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

Please consider my case for individual and/or class action law suite
I was heavily exposed to Round Up by State of California, and my Employer Wheeler Ridge Maricopa Water Storage District application of RoundUp product by the Barrel (WRMWSD) and tank loads (State) ongoingly on and immediately adjacent to the Pumping Plants where I worked from 2013 to 2019 along the California Aquaduct in Kern County California.
I’ve been diagnosed with Prostate cancer (Adenocarcinoma of the prostate) this month (jan 13th, 2022) by UCLA Urologist Dr. Chamie , and I’m scheduled for Prostate surgery by Dr. Gupta of Beverly Hills Cedars Sinai. There is no history of prostate cancer in my family. Dad passed of heart failure at 87, Mom is still with us at 93.
Jayson D Turner

Posted by

Gee, I wonder if Langford and his dishonest attorney can explain why NHL rates are trivially down even as glyphosate use has risen. Perhaps they can explain all of those thousands of studies and all of those regulators that agree that glyphosate is not a probable carcinogen. Perhaps they can explain why Monsanto should warn folks of a risk that there is squat for evidence exists. Perhaps they should find honest jobs. This lawsuit is fraudulent.


Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free