Request Legal Help Now - Free


Missouri Jury Finds in Favor of Johnson & Johnson on Talcum Powder Case

. By
St. Louis, MOJohnson & Johnson (J & J) won its first jury verdict out of four recent Missouri talcum powder cancer lawsuits to go to trial.

A St. Louis jury found on March 3 in favor of Johnson & Johnson and Imerys Talc America in the lawsuit Swann et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al, Case No. 1422-CC09326-01, 22nd Judicial Court of Missouri, which claimed that J & J's Baby Powder caused plaintiff Nora Daniels' ovarian cancer in 2013. The lawsuit also alleged that J & J failed to warn consumers of the cancer risks of its talcum products.

However, Daniels was unable to convince the jury that 38 years of using Johnson & Johnson Baby Powder daily caused her ovarian cancer. After deliberating for less than a day, the jury agreed 11-1 on the verdict in favor of Johnson & Johnson and Imerys, although only nine jury votes were needed.

The verdict in favor of J & J follows three 2016 St. Louis jury verdicts that totaled $197 million.
"I wish we could have sent a message to Johnson & Johnson to put a warning on the product label.”

In October 2016 a St. Louis jury awarded $70 million to a California woman who was diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2012 after using talcum powder regularly for years. Another jury last May awarded $55 million to a South Dakota plaintiff. In February 2016, a St. Louis jury awarded $72 million to relatives of an Alabama woman who died from ovarian cancer.

In those lawsuits, St. Louis juries found that J & J failed to warn the public of studies that linked its talcum-containing products Johnson's Baby Powder and Shower-to-Shower to ovarian cancer.

In its most recent annual report released last month, J & J reported that 3,100 talcum powder lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson in the US and Canada were pending as of January 1, 2017.

The St. Louis-Post Dispatch reported that one juror, Luke Wilson, of St. Louis didn't consider evidence that talcum powder can cause ovarian cancer to be strong enough to require J & J to put warning labels on its products. The one dissenting juror, George Stair, disagreed.

“I think there was enough [evidence], but obviously I didn’t carry the day," Stair told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. "I wish we could have sent a message to Johnson & Johnson to put a warning on the product label.”


Talcum Powder Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a defective products lawyer who may evaluate your Talcum Powder claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

This is a very sad day for the plantiffs. I am a African American man and I used Shower to Shower talcum powder under my arms for years and I don't know how it affected me. To bad.


Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free