Sandra’s doctor advised her to withdraw from Depakote gradually so that her chances of having a seizure would be lessened. But that didn’t sit well with Sandra. She had a tough decision: would a seizure be more dangerous to her unborn baby than Depakote side effects?
“After researching the side effects and reading interviews from distraught parents whose babies were born with Depakote birth defects, I chose to go against my doctor’s recommendation,” says Sandra. She chose to stop Depakote cold turkey.
“Now I wonder how long Depakote stayed in my system and what are the chances that it caused my son to be born with a cleft palate and lip,” she says. “He can have corrective surgery in a few years, but every day, every time I look at him, I feel guilty. If only I had known sooner that I was pregnant, maybe those two months on Depakote did this. And what if I took my doctor’s advice? My son could be autistic or have severe neural problems.” Valproate can also cause major congenital malformations, particularly neural tube defects (e.g., spina bifida). The FDA has warned health care professionals and patients since 2009 about the increased risk of neural tube defects and other major birth defects, such as craniofacial defects and cardiovascular malformations, in babies exposed to valproate sodium and related products (valproic acid and divalproex sodium) during pregnancy.
READ MORE DEPAKOTE BIRTH DEFECT LEGAL NEWS
Meanwhile, the lawsuits against Abbott Laboratories, the Depakote manufacturer, are mounting. Recent lawsuits allege it engaged in illegal marketing practices (Re Abbott-Depakote Shareholder Derivative Litigation, 11-cv-08114, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois). Depakote sales reps supposedly marketed Depakote to nursing home patients with dementia, although scientific studies have not shown any benefits of the drug in treating this condition.
Abbott is already facing many other lawsuits claiming that Depakote resulted in birth defects (In re: Abbott Laboratories Inc., case numbers 12-8020, 12-8021, 12-8022, 12-8023, 12-8024, 12-8025, and 12-8026, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit).