The troubles started in 1995 when James, then a manager, was told that the store didn't generate enough sales to cover his salary so he either took a 13 percent pay cut, or quit. So he stayed.
In 2001, a class action lawsuit was filed against the company. Managers had been mis-classified as exempt: the work they were doing was not in a supervisory capacity. All salaried managers were paid time-and-a-half overtime that exceeded 40 hours and they all became hourly employees. But James worked about 50 hours a week, for years: he didn't receive any back pay."In retrospect, I wish I had hired a lawyer and filed an individual lawsuit against the company," says James. "A lot of those managers in the suit weren't in the same position as me--they didn't have to work so much overtime. I never talked to the lawyers about getting any back pay; I never had a chance to talk in person or even on the phone.
After the lawsuit my hourly rate was $18.72 per hour based on a 40-hour week, plus four hours overtime. I figure that my hourly rate of $18.72 should have been advanced by now due to the cost of living. Instead, it was reduced because sales are slow. Currently my pay is $16.37 per hour and I have a family to support—I have three kids.
My co-workers are either ex-co-workers or just as frustrated as me. Some of them quit after the pay cut and the ones who are left are getting messed around like me. I just continued working. As if that wasn't a kick in the pants, here is another "issue".
A new kind of pay system was installed, called E-Time. I am entitled to six weeks vacation pay per year but since this new system was introduced, it isn't appearing on my pay stubs. I have talked with my District manager and payroll. Their answer: that is E-Time--which is no answer at all.
This is what happened. On August 8, 2007 I did a physical inventory for another store and I waited three pay periods—I didn't get paid for the job. Instead they took it from sick leave, again no reason was given.
READ MORE CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW LEGAL NEWS
As for my vacation balance during the same pay periods, it starts at 158 hours and drops to 91 hours. But I didn't take a vacation. Again, blame it on E-Time. But what about my time? I've brought this up with my supervisor but again, she just says it is E-Time. That is not a real answer!
I tried to file a complaint with the Fair Employment Practices in Oakland but I was told my case is too extreme and I would have to get a personal lawyer. In other words, they didn't want to handle it. I don't have the power to dispute these ongoing payroll indiscretions—I have multiple complaints and just want some answers."