Request Legal Help Now - Free


California Donning and Doffing

Were you looking for California Unpaid Wages lawsuits?

California employees have filed lawsuits alleging they are not properly paid for time spent donning and doffing safety gear, special uniforms, or other clothing required for their jobs. In addition to putting on and taking off work gear, such wage and hour lawsuits may also encompass allegations involving forced security checks, lengthy log-in sessions, or other unpaid work activities. As a result, employees say they have lost out on wages and overtime pay. Although the per-shift amount of money lost to unpaid donning and doffing time may seem small, over the course of a year it can add up to a significant amount, especially if it counts as overtime.


Send your California Donning and Doffing claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.

California Donning and Doffing

California donning and doffing refers to procedures in which employees are required to wear specialty gear—including uniforms, safety gear, or other tools and equipment—or undertake other work-related activities before they are allowed to begin their official work duties. In the case of specialty clothing, gear can take up to 20 minutes to put on and take off, and employers sometimes require employees to put on and take off the gear before and after work and at the start and end of meal breaks.

construction worker People who work with computers might be required to undergo lengthy log-in and log-out procedures at the start and end of every shift and during breaks, but they may not be paid for that time. Employees might also be required to take part in unpaid team meetings or spend long hours waiting for security checks before they can leave a worksite.

The Supreme Court has ruled that employees should be paid for time employees spend involved in certain activities, if those activities are essential to the work being done. The courts also consider whether the employer or the employee benefits from the required safety gear. Although employees benefit from safety gear by being protected from job-related hazards, employers also benefit by paying less in employee sick time in the event employees are injured on the job.

There may also be a question of how much control the employee has in the circumstances surrounding donning and doffing. If employees are required to leave the safety gear at work, and are therefore unable to fully prepare for work while at home, they may be eligible for compensation.

California Donning and Doffing Lawsuits

In 2012, the Hilton Los Angeles Airport Hotel agreed to pay $2.5 million to settle a wage and hour class action lawsuit. Part of the lawsuit alleged employees were not paid for time spent putting on and taking off uniforms that they were required to leave at the hotel. Included in the lawsuit were allegations that employees were also not given proper breaks.

Donning and doffing wage and hour lawsuits allege that employees should be compensated for time spent involved in certain work activities and that compensation should either come in the form of having that time included in the regular workday or as overtime pay outside of the regular shift.

California Donning and Doffing Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated on


Taylor Farm’s Don-Doff Deal is Off
Taylor Farm’s Don-Doff Deal is Off
September 18, 2019
Tracy, CAA proposed $5.3 million settlement by Taylor Farms Pacific Inc. to resolve claims that employees were not paid for donning and doffing and other California labor law violations was declined by a California federal judge last month, because the court “cannot simply rubber stamp a class action settlement.”

Ninth Circuit Confirms Death of “De Minimus” Rule in California Wage and Hour Lawsuits
Ninth Circuit Confirms Death of “De Minimus” Rule in California Wage and Hour Lawsuits
July 15, 2019
San Francisco, CA On June 28, the Ninth Circuit confirmed that, in lawsuits brought under the California Labor Code, even very small amounts of work time – measured in seconds, not minutes – must be counted and compensated. The opinion in Rodriguez v. Nike should put an end to latest employer-driven campaign to revive the federal de minimus standard in California labor lawsuits.

Too Hard to Eat Lunch? – That Cost Wal-Mart $6 Million
Too Hard to Eat Lunch?  – That Cost Wal-Mart $6 Million
June 26, 2019
Los Angeles, CA Chelsea Hamilton and Alyssa Hernandez brought a class action California labor lawsuit against Wal-Mart, claiming that going through the mandatory security check took so much time and was so intrusive that they were left with less than their legally protected half-hour meal break. Taking feminine hygiene stuff out of their purses was embarrassing. Ms. Hernandez also said the break room was crowded and noisy. They were not prevented from taking the break, but they were discouraged out of it. In April, they won a $6.1 million jury award on behalf of Wal-Mart workers.


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Request Legal Help Now! - Free