Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Diamond Antitrust

This is a settlement for the Antitrust lawsuit.

Newark, NJ: (Jan-09-08) A series of class action lawsuits were brought against the De Beers Diamond Company, alleging that De Beers charged anticompetitive prices for rough diamonds it sold. They also claimed that De Beers monopolized the rough diamond market and disseminated false and misleading advertising. Sources close to the case stated that a settlement had been reached, resolving the lawsuits.

As part of the settlement reached, a $295 million fund has been created. It will allegedly be distributed to two groups, or classes, of purchasers: the Direct Purchaser Class and the Indirect Purchaser Class. The Direct Purchaser Class includes persons or businesses, other than Diamond Trading Company Sightholders, that purchased any gem diamond directly from De Beers, or one of its diamond mining competitors, between September 20, 1997 and March 31, 2006. The Indirect Purchaser Class includes persons or businesses that purchased gem diamonds, diamond jewelry, or other products containing diamonds from someone other than De Beers or one of its mining competitors between January 1, 1994 and March 31, 2006. [CENTRE DAILY: DIAMOND ANTITRUST]


Legal Help

If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in our form.
Published on Jan-10-08


ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Request Legal Help Now! - Free