The feds, for their part, say they are doing nothing of the sort. They have, in fact, extended “guidance” to the banks with regard to illegal payday lenders seeking and issuing loans to consumers in states where lenders are not licensed to do so. Guidance, say regulators, is not the same as enforcement. Nor is it coercion.
To that end, the Federal Reserve, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency filed separate motions to dismiss the payday loan lawsuit filed by Community Financial Services Association of America Ltd. (CFSA) and one of its member institutions in Washington, DC federal court in June.
The feds argue that the case is improper because regulators have not yet issued a final ruling.
Payday loans are a fact of life for low-income individuals who don’t have a relationship with a traditional bank or have poor credit. Interest rates for payday loans are usually higher than rates for traditional loans acquired through banking institutions. However, most states observe strict interest rate caps for both storefront operations and Internet payday lenders who solicit loans in that state and therefore must adhere to state regulations based upon where a loan client resides, regardless of the location from which the lender itself is actually based.
Some states don’t allow payday loans of any kind.
A growing problem, however - and the impetus behind Operation Choke Point - is the rise in illegal Internet payday loan lenders who stand accused of charging predatory interest and other fees for short-term loans. It is for this reason that scores of plaintiffs have sought payday loan legal help. Such operators also make it harder for honest Internet lenders who play by the rules.
READ MORE PAYDAY LOANS LEGAL NEWS
That’s hogwash, according to the FDIC. In a memorandum, the regulator noted that “‘scrutiny’ is not the same as ‘pressure’; not even plaintiffs claim that the FDIC is barred from applying ‘scrutiny’ to banks’ third-party relationships when monitoring the safety and soundness of those banks’ operations,” the FDIC said.
The CFSA indicates that its members do not issue Internet payday loans in states where the products are banned. The case is Consumer Financial Services Association of America et al. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. et al., case number 1:14-cv-00953, in the US District Court for the District of Columbia.