Home Page Hot Legal Issues Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit
Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit
Some reverse mortgage lenders are accused of using deceptive and aggressive tactics to lure senior homeowners into taking out a reverse mortgage. Among the complaints about information on reverse mortgages seniors say they are given are allegations that seniors were not informed of the risks associated with reverse mortgages and were told there was no risk of a reverse mortgage default leading to foreclosure. In truth, there is a possibility of defaulting, and many seniors have had their homes foreclosed when they were unable to pay the reverse mortgage.
A reverse mortgage allows senior homeowners (over the age of 62) to borrow a certain amount of money against the value of their home without having to make any interest or principal payments. The mortgage is only due when the homeowner dies, sells the house or moves out. Accrued interest is added to the loan balance.
But, interest rates are typically higher than on traditional mortgages and the interest compounds, meaning by the time the homeowner has to pay back the reverse mortgage, he or she could owe more than double what was initially loaned. Furthermore, homeowners are still responsible for paying the insurance and taxes.
In some cases, older spouses have been put on the deed for the reverse mortgage and the younger spouses told their names could be added later. When their name wasn't added and their older spouse passed away, the lenders came looking for repayment and threatened foreclosure if they did not get it.
In addition to how quickly the interest compounds, there are concerns with how aggressive lenders are in marketing to seniors. Complaints include lenders marketing to seniors who cannot afford the fees, not explaining the risks associated with reverse mortgages and deceptive sales tactics. Some lenders have been accused of marketing reverse mortgages as free money. Others reportedly told seniors there was no risk of losing their home.
Information on Reverse Mortgage
Some reverse mortgage lawsuits have been filed against lenders, alleging their tactics are illegal. In 2011, lawsuits were reportedly filed against Wells Fargo and Fannie Mae, alleging they used illegal means to foreclose on homes that were subject to reverse mortgages. According to the lawsuits, the people who took out the reverse mortgage paid insurance that guaranteed when the borrower died, heirs would have the opportunity to buy the home at its appraised value, not at the value of the full mortgage balance, if home prices fell. Despite this, some lenders are accused of forcing heirs to pay the full mortgage balance, not the appraised value of the home. When the heirs refused, they lenders allegedly pushed the home into foreclosure.
Reverse Mortgage Attorney
Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit Legal HelpIf you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your Reverse Mortgage Lawsuit complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated on Oct-19-12
REVERSE MORTGAGE LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Reverse Mortgage Lenders Allegedly Prey on Seniors
READ MORE [ Consumer Banking Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Financial Settlements and Legal News ]
Had I known that the interest rates on the reverse mortgage would amount to $900 a month I would never have considered it. My property taxes are $400 a month so together with the interest I am paying as much as my original house payment. This is not a good option for anyone to consider.
I also got reverse mtg, along with my husband who passed from als in 2011, Our bank at the time held house in trust. So Bank of America put lien on property for the loan ,understood,We have an adjacent lot which we were going to sign over to my son after my death, well I just found out because I put lot in same trust that house is in by mistake thinking they were still seperate because different tax numbers, Now because I want to sell to my son (the lot) Champion Mtg who bank of america sold my loan to will not write a letter to my bank releseing any interest in lot and are askiing all kiinds of questions about it and wants it surveyed and legal description. This lot has nothing to do with my original loan for reverse mtg. But my bank will not let me sell lot to my son without their(Champion mtg letter).
my husband and I have a reverse mortgage . it's been sold to at least 3 different holders now. However, that's not been my problem. my question is this.
Say my husband and I, or just one of us, has a car accident , then perhaps it's our negligence [ God forbid ] we are only in our young 70's mind you...but, if that did happen and we didn't have enough ins. liability on our car or motorcycle polices and the injured parties sued us... how would that affect our reverse mortgage ?
I assumed that their/ Mortgage co. being the first lien holder nothing would come of it in that respect except they/ injured parties, would be entitled to whatever would be left over after our deaths and the house is sold...am I correct ? that's supposedly we couldn't afford to pay any judgement of the amt. over our policies. Is this interesting enough to answer me back ? or do I need an attorney to answer my questions ? thank you
My father had a reverse mortgage on his home; he passed away in 2008. I lived with him and remained in the home after his death with financial freedoms permission. I was never on the mortgage. Now that they are foreclosing, they took his name off the mortgage and are suing me personally. My father never put the house in his will and it was not left to me.
Elderly parent entered into a Reverse Mortgage loan. She died in 2007. Five servicers have attempted to collect this debt. We feel our mother entered into this agreement as a result of predatory
lending. At 81 years old, she was unable to make that kind of decision. The foreclosure process is now accelerated to final judgement stage.
I have to figure how to get hud to step up hud was given fordged falcefied documents intending to defraud hud and regsterrs office becoies of electronic recording from 2001 till eviction documents given in 2008 hud assured me a home gifted in wills of mom and dad trust and grant deed in 1993 and regersted that eney property buy trstmentery transfer!!irrovacible at death 2001 trust&wills agrementes Hud Fha world alliance the providers of reverse mortages rull book and prociduers revised 8/2008 no home being held for but in living trust to allow famley to have control my sister and myself co extutors and in will as co trustees the house for over 21/2 years no onw will provide singed documents no onw will show me the documents that were foraged made mom sine blank documents and blank places and no whitness no notary at singing od documents numbers don't add up I don't think hud was given assignment of deed not examond not verified stamped but also deed uses as proff was second deed first seven days earlery stamped no confederation ????//I requested change of deed but they made up a faxe to use non judicial state gives theves a unquestioned right to bo as they wish and make up deeds trustee documents with no proff WELL LETS JUST SEE THE REASON I COUDENT FIGHT AS HARD AS I NEED TO WITHOUT A LAUWER MY SSISTERS HELTH MORE IMPORNTENT WITH AN ANURISERIM BEHIND HART NOT OPRATABLE SPECIAL NEDS HANDYCAPED AND DISABELD IAM DISABELD AS WELL I AM GOWING TO TRY AND GET ANCERS AND IF I FIND OUT I WILL SHARE
ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE