Lawyers and Settlements
Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> IVC Blood Clot Filter Lawsuits Filed in Canada

IVC Blood Clot Filter Lawsuits Filed in Canada

Were you looking for Inferior Vena Cava Filters or IVC Filters lawsuits?

Vancouver, Canada: Two defective product class action lawsuits have been filed in Canada against Cook Medical, the makers of IVC Filters Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) filters alleged to fragment inside the body causing serious, potentially life threatening medical issues.

The IVC filter is so named after the inferior vena cava, a primary artery. Patients who do not tolerate blood thinners and are at risk for stroke will often have an IVC filter implanted in the inferior vena cava to “catch” a meandering blood clot before it can migrate to the lung.

IVC filters are used temporarily until the threat of blood clots have passed. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has stated that the filters should be removed from the patient’s body within 29-54 days to prevent possible health issues.

According to a study published in JAMA (4/8/13), although the retrievable IVC filters are designed to offer temporary protection, many are left implanted indefinitely. The authors conducted a review of IVC filter use from August 1, 2003 through February 28, 2011 and found that of 679 retrievable IVC filters, only 58 were successfully removed. Thirteen patients had unsuccessful retrieval events. Meanwhile, 74 patients had thrombotic events after IVC filter placements. Researchers concluded that use of IVC filters for certain uses resulted in "suboptimal outcomes."

In one of the Canadian IVC filter class actions, a plaintiff alleges that she had the device temporarily implanted on August 2013, as a precaution to help prevent blood clots. However, during the removal surgery the doctors discovered the device had moved to another location in her body and could not be removed as the procedure was determined to be too risky.

In the other class action, the plaintiff alleges that removal of the IVC filter was unsuccessfully attempted twice. A third surgery was scheduled but was deemed too risky and did not happen. The plaintiff claims he suffered dizzy spells because the device was actually clogging blood flow in his body.

The allegations made by plaintiffs in two class action suits are that the filters were defectively manufactured since they have fragmented while inside the patient’s body or have come loose and migrated to other parts of the body, thus creating serious and ongoing medical issues. The fragments of the filter have the potential to puncture veins or become caught in the intestines.

IVC Filter Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in our form and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Published on Jun-20-16


Study Suggests IVC Filter Use is on the Decline, But Problems Remain
Study Suggests IVC Filter Use is on the Decline, But Problems Remain
November 25, 2017
St. Louis, MO: Does a win by Cook Medical in a recent bellwether IVC filter lawsuit, together with the release of a study suggesting that IVC filter use is beginning to trend downwards after thirty years of growth, point to the beginning of a sea change for the inferior vena cava filter industry, and IVC filter patients [READ MORE]

Did FDA Fast-Track Contribute to IVC Filter Injuries?
Did FDA Fast-Track Contribute to IVC Filter Injuries?
November 10, 2017
Washington, DC: While we wait for the bellwether trials to proceed in the Cook IVC Filter Litigation MDL and the Bard IVC Filters MDL, maybe it’s time to have a conversation about root causes. How did we end up in late 2017 with more than 2,000 pending IVC filter lawsuits? One thing these IVC filter injury cases have in common is this: the medical devices were approved under a fast-track Federal Drug Administration process, known as 510(k) Clearance. Is the process flawed [READ MORE]

Cook Celect IVC Filters Approved Through FDA Fast Track Approval Process
Cook Celect IVC Filters Approved Through FDA Fast Track Approval Process
October 18, 2017
Indianapolis, IN: One of the manufacturers of inferior vena cava filters facing lawsuits is Cook Medical, the enterprise behind the Cook Celect line of IVC filters. The devices are placed into the inferior vena cava, the primary artery returning deoxygenated blood from the lower extremities up to the heart and lungs. The devices by Cook and other manufacturers have been known to fracture, or become dislodged and drift towards vital organs. Designed to be removed, they often can’t. One Cook Celect IVC filter lawsuit filed last April alleges negligence and a defective design [READ MORE]


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.