Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Home Page >> News Articles >> Plaintiffs Celebrate Invokana Lawsuit Co..

Plaintiffs Celebrate Invokana Lawsuit Consolidation

. By
Trenton, NJ Plaintiffs involved in Invokana lawsuits are celebrating now that at least some lawsuits have been consolidated for pretrial proceedings. The Invokana claims were filed against drug maker Johnson & Johnson and allege the company failed adequately test the drug before releasing it on the market and did not warn consumers about the risks associated with using the diabetes medication.

The Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation noted that the claims made against Johnson & Johnson subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceuticals had similar questions of fact and would be more efficient if pretrial proceedings were consolidated. In consolidating the lawsuits, however, the panel decided not to include Farxiga and Jardiance, which are similar diabetes medications that also face lawsuits.

At the time of consolidation—early December 2016—29 lawsuits from New Jersey were joined with additional lawsuits from other district courts, including California, Georgia, and Illinois. The judicial panel noted it was aware of 44 related federal actions that were not included in the transfer order. In September 2016, plaintiffs filed a motion to consolidate the lawsuits, which Janssen agreed to on the basis that the lawsuits raised similar issues.

Those lawsuits alleged diabetes patients were put at an increased risk of diabetic ketoacidosis and kidney damage because Janssen did not properly test its drug and did not warn patients about those risks when the drug was made available for patient use. Janssen has said it stands by the safety of its drug and will defend against the allegations.

Invokana is in a class of drugs called Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and is used to help patients with type 2 diabetes manage their blood glucose levels. It was first approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2013.

Lawsuit consolidation is not a comment on the merits of the claims, it is simply done when a large number of lawsuits have similar questions of fact and the judicial panel finds it more efficient to consolidate for early proceedings. The panel ruled against including similar drugs in the multidistrict litigation because having a multi-defendant multidistrict litigation could draw out the proceedings.

As of December 15, 2016, there were 63 lawsuits consolidated in the multidistrict litigation. The lawsuits are consolidated in MDL 2750, In Re: Invokana (Canagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation before US District Judge Brian R. Martinotti.

READ ABOUT INVOKANA LAWSUITS

Invokana Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your Invokana claim at no cost or obligation.
Request Legal Help Now
Sponsored by Gibbs Law Firm
Advertisement

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free