LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Defective Furnaces
This is a settlement for the Defective Product lawsuit.
Washington, DC: (Jan-04-08) A class action lawsuit was filed against Carrier Corporation, alleging that Carrier Corporation brands Bryant, Payne, and Day & Night furnaces were defective. Sources close to the case stated that the company had reached a settlement agreement to resolve the class action. Under the agreement, anyone with a Carrier Corporation furnace manufactured after Jan. 1, 1989 in their home or business could now be eligible for benefits extending from the settlement. At the heart of the dispute was that investigations had revealed that a component in the furnaces could crack and release carbon monoxide. Under the agreement, Carrier is offering owners compensation for repairs or credit to put toward a replacement furnace.
[CHANNEL 3000 NEWS: DEFECTIVE FURNACES]
Published on Jan-7-08
Legal Help
If you have a similar problem and would like to be contacted by a lawyer at no cost or obligation, please fill in our form.Published on Jan-7-08
READER COMMENTS
John Cares
on
John Robinson
on
Robert Lederer
on
Mark
on
Jeff Branham
on
mitzie
on
Charles May
on
Mark
on
I found out about the suit after two years without a furnace. We had twice had HVAC repair firms onsite (and one sold Bryant furnaces). They both told us that the heat exchanger was not longer made and couldn't be ordered for repair. Making one last effort to try and locate the part, I came across the class action information purely by chance. I contacted Carrier and our Bryant furnace was checked by serial number and confirmed one of the units covered by the class action suit.
We approached Bryant for extended warranty coverage, which the settlement agreement says includes parts and labor. Bryant referred us to three authorized dealers. One wouldn't even talk to us. One strung us along for 2 months and said they would not make the repair. The final dealer did come onsite to look but then ultimately also said they would not make the repair. The problem? Carrier/Bryant refused to pay more than 4 hours of labor for the service and it was estimated to take about twice that.
We contacted Bryant again. They said "it's not our responsibility to locate a repair person for you". We asked then that they just ship the part to us and we would arrange to install it. They declined. They put us in touch with a regional manager who said "well we pay four hours I don't care what the settlement says ... and you know, there are a lot of other ways I can bill you ... travel time, inspection, whatever".
We called one of the four law firms involved in the class action. They were initially very helpful in offering to research. They gave us contact information to Bryant's in-house counsel, then said they would make contact for us. After that they stopped talking to us altogether and ignored further phone calls, stonewalling us at he receptionist. We found the contact information was invalid for Bryant's in-house attorney.
So, that leaves us now going on our third year without heat in one floor of the house. How do you force a company like Carrier to be bound by the terms of their settlement agreement if they simply refuse to be bound. I read that the law firms received 9.5 million in the settlement. Is that not enough for a little after-the-fact follow up to ensure that what they did was of any actual use to anyone, or it is just "give us the money and then hell with you".
Edgar J. Sanchez, Sr.
on
Dan Johnson
on
Who do I contact to get this replaced.
Susan Mark
on
Sheri Rowland
on
LEVON ESIBOV
on
Thanks,
Levon.