Request Legal Help Now - Free


Multidistrict Litigations Involving IVC Filters Continue to Grow

. By
Phoenix, AZTwo IVC filter multidistrict litigations continue to grow, as more lawsuits alleging serious complications linked to the filters have been filed. These complications reportedly include filter migration and perforation of blood vessels. In some cases, the inferior vena cava filters have been linked to patient death.

The two multidistrict litigations involve Cook Medical (MDL 2570) and C.R. Bard (MDL 2641), and both are still in the early stages. The Cook MDL currently houses just over 650 lawsuits (as of July 15, 2016), while the Bard MDL includes slightly more than 700. As bellwether trials approach, however, the number of lawsuits added to the MDLs could continue to grow.

That's because patients who had retrievable IVC filters implanted may not have had them taken out yet, even though the retrievable filters were only meant to be implanted for a short time - until the risk of pulmonary embolism has passed. The FDA warns that filters left in too long increase the risks of a serious complication. But the question of who is responsible for problems with the filters remains. Device makers say the filters are left in too long, and it is up to patients and their doctors to follow up for device removal.

Patients and doctors say the issue is with faulty device design. Critics argue the filters should not break and definitely should not put people's lives in jeopardy even if they are left in too long. Further, they argue, some filters don't even last long enough to outlive the risk of pulmonary.

Case in point: Gloria Adams, who according to a 2015 NBC News report died at age 55 only one week after an IVC filter was implanted following a brain aneurysm. According to the autopsy, a blood clot pushed the filter into Adams' heart, causing it to puncture. Even if doctors planned to retrieve the filter, it is unlikely they would have done so only a week after it was implanted.

One of the people concerned about the IVC filters was Kay Fuller, who was hired by Bard to help get its Recovery filter approved by the FDA after the agency rejected the filter. But Fuller tells NBC when she voiced her concerns about the filters - including that she did not receive important safety data - she was told she would be fired if she pursued the matter. Fuller ultimately resigned from Bard, although she alleges an application for the filter was sent to the FDA with her signature forged.

So far, at least two-dozen deaths have reportedly been linked to the Recovery filter, with another 300 non-fatal incidents.


IVC Filter Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your IVC Filter claim at no cost or obligation.


Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free