Worse still, the virulent bacteria - known as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), claims hospitals and nursing homes as its most common breeding ground.
In other words, the very places you go to get well, or the haven for your twilight years, could kill you, given the presence of the germ.
MRSA is not new, but the research is--an exhaustive government study conducted by researchers associated with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDCP) in Atlanta, and appearing today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).
The research suggests that MRSA infections are twice as common as previously thought, according to lead author Dr. R. Monina Klevens. The study suggests that the risk translates statistically to 32 cases per 100,000 people.
"This confirms in a very rigorous way that this is a huge health problem," said Dr. John A. Jernigan, the deputy chief of prevention and response in the division of healthcare quality promotion at the CDCP, in comments published this morning in the New York Times.
"And it drives home that what we do in health care will have a lot to do with how we control it."
The increased prevalence of the MRSA bacteria, and the ease with which it can be transferred between patients, health care workers and un-sterilized equipment, puts the onus on the health care industry to minimize the spread of MRSA.
An already active debate on whether or not hospitals should be screening incoming patients for the MRSA bacteria will no doubt heighten as the result of this latest study.
Some feel that isolating patients who have presented with the MRSA bacteria should be considered, but the jury is still out.
In the meantime, focus is turning to the hospital and health care environment as 'ground zero,' in an attempt to mitigate the spread of MRSA.
According to Dr. Lance R. Peterson, an epidemiologist with Evanston Northwestern Healthcare (and revealed in the New York Times today), his hospital system in the Chicago area reduced the rate of invasive MRSA infection by 60 per cent after it began screening all patients in 2005.
Other efforts, such as simple hand washing by hospital and health-care workers, could also contribute towards a mitigation of the spread of MRSA. Studies have shown that workers in busy hospitals ignore basic practice and protocols regarding hand-washing more than half the time.
Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports, is lobbying for the publication of hand washing compliance rates among hospitals.
Lisa A. McGiffert is the manager of the "Stop Hospital Infections" campaign at Consumers Union. "This study just accentuates that the hospital is ground zero," she says, "that this is where dangerous infections are occurring that are killing people every day."
The MRSA bacteria was first isolated in the U.S. in 1968 and is known to cause 10 to 20 per cent of all infections acquired in the health care setting. It is resistant to a number of front-line antibiotics, and is quite hardy and easily transmitted. Once it gets hold, it can be deadly.
READ MORE Hospital Infection LEGAL NEWS
"This study puts more onus on organizations that don't do active surveillance to demonstrate that they're reducing their MRSA infections," says Dr. Peterson of Chicago. "...MRSA is theoretically a totally preventable disease."
Researchers extrapolated data collected in nine places, estimating that 94,360 patients developed an invasive infection from the MRSA pathogen in 2005. Nearly one of every five, or 18,650 of them, died.
In an editorial accompanying the published study in today's edition of the JAMA Dr. Elizabeth A. Bancroft, an epidemiologist with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, called the findings "astounding."
READER COMMENTS
Jeff Jones
on
mark edwards
on