LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
MRI Gadolinium Lawsuit
Read our MRI Health Risk FAQ
Gadolinium, a contrast dye used with patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)s, has been linked to serious adverse effects such as gadolinium deposition disease. Since its approval in 1988, gadolinium has been found to accumulate within the cerebrospinal fluid and other parts of the body: According to FDA reports, a single injection of gadolinium could potentially result in the development of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) / Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NFD). Hundreds of MRI lawsuits have been filed, claiming gadolinium manufacturers hid the risks of MRI kidney damage from the public.
In most patients with kidney insufficiency, the kidneys eliminate gadolinium from the body after it is used as a contrast agent for MRIs. But recent studies have shown that deposits of gadolinium may remain in the brain and other parts of the body, even in patients with normal kidney function.
Since 1997, hundreds of NSF/NFD cases have been reported to the NFD Registry. This debilitating and sometimes fatal disease causes discoloration and thickening or tightening of the skin and connective tissues that inhibits the ability to move and may result in broken bones. It causes muscle weakness and difficulty bending joints, which can lead to scarring of internal organs that inhibit their ability to function properly.
In 2006, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acknowledged that there were 200 reports worldwide of NSF/NFD due to patients exposed to various gadolinium- based contrast agents. The report conceded many of these were serious and some fatal.
If a patient experiences one or more of these symptoms, they may have developed gadolinium toxicity or poisoning. Testing for retained gadolinium is the next step in determining whether the symptoms due to the gadolinium contrast agent used for the MRI or MRA. There are two types of tests which might be used: 24-hour urine gadolinium test; and heavy metal testing using blood, hair or nail samples, or urine.
In 2015, the agency announced the launch of an investigation into the potential formation of gadolinium deposits on the brain after multiple MRIs. The FDA stated, “Recent publications in the medical literature have reported that deposits of GBCAs (gadolinium-based contrast agents) remain in the brains of some patients who undergo four or more contrast MRI scans, long after the last administration. It is unknown whether these gadolinium deposits are harmful or can lead to adverse health effects.”
The FDA in December, 2017 published a new MedWatch Alert, requiring a new class warning and other safety measures for all gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) concerning gadolinium remaining in patients’ bodies, including the brain, for months to years after receiving these drugs.
In the journal Radiology, (June, 2015) researchers at the Mayo Clinic found that patients who had been exposed to gadolinium multiple times showed traces of the contrast agent in their brain tissue, and levels of gadolinium in these brains corresponded to the number of MRIs the patients had undergone.
The second study, published in Investigative Radiology, found that laboratory rats had high levels of gadolinium in their brains as well as MRI abnormalities believed to be linked to the contrast agent.
A more recent study published in Radiology strongly suggests that some types of contrast dyes used in MRI exams may remain in the brain for years. The authors found that gadolinium accumulates within the cerebrospinal fluid of patients exposed to gadobutrol, and that accumulation was observed in patients with normal renal function and intact blood-brain barriers.
Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany, manufactures Magnevist; GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, U.K., is the maker of Omniscan; OptiMARK is manufactured by Mallinckrodt, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.; and ProHance and Multihance are made by Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Princeton, N.J.
(The Radiology Report medical record document for an MRI or MRA with contrast dye usually shows the brand name of the GBCA injected for the procedure.)
Bayer reached agreements in principle with many plaintiffs in the U.S. to settle their claims, saying it will continue to consider the option of settling individual lawsuits on a case-by-case basis. Bayer has taken accounting measures and is insured against product liability risks to the extent customary in the industry.
Bayer's 2008 annual report states the following: "All cases pending in federal courts have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (mdl) proceeding for common pre-trial management. Bayer believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend itself vigorously. Based on the information currently available, Bayer has taken accounting measures for anticipated defense costs."
Last updated on
FREE MRI HEALTH RISK LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your MRI Health Risk claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Gadolinium
Gadolinium is a rare-earth metal; a clear, non-radioactive chemical compound used with patients undergoing MRI -- magnetic resonance imaging. MRI is a non-invasive diagnostic procedure that enables physicians to visualize internal organs through magnetic interactions and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The use of gadolinium during an MRI or MRA improves the visibility of internal structures.In most patients with kidney insufficiency, the kidneys eliminate gadolinium from the body after it is used as a contrast agent for MRIs. But recent studies have shown that deposits of gadolinium may remain in the brain and other parts of the body, even in patients with normal kidney function.
FREE MRI HEALTH RISK LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your MRI Health Risk claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
MRI and Kidney Failure
Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF) or Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NFD) is a man-made disease that was first recognized in 1997. The cause was unknown until recently: it has been attributed to current gadolinium-based contrast agents used in MRI procedures in patients with kidney failure.Since 1997, hundreds of NSF/NFD cases have been reported to the NFD Registry. This debilitating and sometimes fatal disease causes discoloration and thickening or tightening of the skin and connective tissues that inhibits the ability to move and may result in broken bones. It causes muscle weakness and difficulty bending joints, which can lead to scarring of internal organs that inhibit their ability to function properly.
In 2006, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) acknowledged that there were 200 reports worldwide of NSF/NFD due to patients exposed to various gadolinium- based contrast agents. The report conceded many of these were serious and some fatal.
Gadolinium-related Symptoms
A patient who has received an injection of contrast dye may develop some symptoms within a few months of their MRI or MRA procedure. These various gadolinium-related symptoms include:- Persistent headache;
- "Brain fog";
- Skin that appears spongy or rubbery, which is actually subcutaneous soft tissue thickening;
- Tendons and ligaments which are painful and have a thickened appearance;
- Bone and joint pain;
- Tightness in hands and feet; and,
- Pain described as burning, cutting, or "pins and needles" in the arms or legs and the torso.
If a patient experiences one or more of these symptoms, they may have developed gadolinium toxicity or poisoning. Testing for retained gadolinium is the next step in determining whether the symptoms due to the gadolinium contrast agent used for the MRI or MRA. There are two types of tests which might be used: 24-hour urine gadolinium test; and heavy metal testing using blood, hair or nail samples, or urine.
Gadolinium and the FDA
In 2007 the FDA asked the manufacturers of gadolinium-based contrast agents to issue a black box warning. The label now warns patients with severe kidney insufficiency who receive gadolinium-based agents that they are at risk for developing NSF/NFD. As well, the label states that patients just before or just after liver transplantation, or those with chronic liver disease, are also at risk for developing NSF if they are experiencing kidney insufficiency of any severity.In 2015, the agency announced the launch of an investigation into the potential formation of gadolinium deposits on the brain after multiple MRIs. The FDA stated, “Recent publications in the medical literature have reported that deposits of GBCAs (gadolinium-based contrast agents) remain in the brains of some patients who undergo four or more contrast MRI scans, long after the last administration. It is unknown whether these gadolinium deposits are harmful or can lead to adverse health effects.”
The FDA in December, 2017 published a new MedWatch Alert, requiring a new class warning and other safety measures for all gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) concerning gadolinium remaining in patients’ bodies, including the brain, for months to years after receiving these drugs.
Gadolinium Research and Studies
Two studies led to the FDA’s 2015 investigation, both documenting the presence of gadolinium deposits in the brains of individuals who have undergone multiple MRIs.In the journal Radiology, (June, 2015) researchers at the Mayo Clinic found that patients who had been exposed to gadolinium multiple times showed traces of the contrast agent in their brain tissue, and levels of gadolinium in these brains corresponded to the number of MRIs the patients had undergone.
The second study, published in Investigative Radiology, found that laboratory rats had high levels of gadolinium in their brains as well as MRI abnormalities believed to be linked to the contrast agent.
A more recent study published in Radiology strongly suggests that some types of contrast dyes used in MRI exams may remain in the brain for years. The authors found that gadolinium accumulates within the cerebrospinal fluid of patients exposed to gadobutrol, and that accumulation was observed in patients with normal renal function and intact blood-brain barriers.
Approved Gadolinium-based Contrast Agents
Five gadolinium-based contrast agents have been approved for use in the United States: Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine), Ominiscan (gadodiamide); OptiMARK (gadoversetamide); MultiHance (gadobenate dimeglumine); and Prohance (gadoteridol). Reports have identified the development of NSF following single and multiple administrations of the gadolinium-based contrast agents, with Omniscan as the most commonly reported agent, followed by Magnevist and OptiMARK.Bayer Schering Pharma, Berlin, Germany, manufactures Magnevist; GE Healthcare, Chalfont St. Giles, U.K., is the maker of Omniscan; OptiMARK is manufactured by Mallinckrodt, Inc., Hazelwood, Mo.; and ProHance and Multihance are made by Bracco Diagnostics Inc., Princeton, N.J.
(The Radiology Report medical record document for an MRI or MRA with contrast dye usually shows the brand name of the GBCA injected for the procedure.)
MRI Health Risk Lawsuits
According to Missouri Lawyers Weekly, hundreds of gadolinium cases have been filed across the U.S. In 2017, a gadolinium deposition disease lawsuit was against the maker of a gadolinium-based contrast agent, alleging patients were not properly warned about the risks associated with gadolinium retention. (Case number CGC-17-562228, in Superior Court for the State of California, County of San Francisco.)Bayer Gadolinium Lawsuits
Just a few weeks after the FDA's black box warning was issued, the mother of a 24-year-old Ohio man who died in August 2004 after receiving his second injection of the drug Magnevist, filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court against Bayer, the manufacturer, claiming the gadolinium-based contrast agent caused her son's death. By June 30, 2009, Bayer had been served in a total of 317 lawsuits involving Magnevist, its gadolinium-based contrast agent. Four other contrast agents are also involved in gadolinium litigation.Bayer reached agreements in principle with many plaintiffs in the U.S. to settle their claims, saying it will continue to consider the option of settling individual lawsuits on a case-by-case basis. Bayer has taken accounting measures and is insured against product liability risks to the extent customary in the industry.
Bayer's 2008 annual report states the following: "All cases pending in federal courts have been consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (mdl) proceeding for common pre-trial management. Bayer believes that it has meritorious defenses and intends to defend itself vigorously. Based on the information currently available, Bayer has taken accounting measures for anticipated defense costs."
MRI Health Risk Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered health problems as a result of gadolinium given during an MRI or MRA, please click the link below to send your complaint to a lawyer to evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Last updated on
MRI HEALTH RISK LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Health Canada in Gadolinium Denial
Gadolinium Dyeing Out?
MRI with Gadolinium – Better to be Safe than Sorry?
September 13, 2019
Fort Saskatchewan, AB: How can a heavy metal accumulate in the brain but not be considered harmful? After undergoing seven MRI scans, all with injections of a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), Wanda Milley experienced the same gadolinium contrast dye side effects that many other patients have suffered, and have subsequently filed gadolinium lawsuits. READ MORE
Gadolinium Dyeing Out?
August 13, 2019
Many reports of adverse side events associated with gadolinium contrast dye, along with recent data showing that gadolinium deposits in the brain and other organs have spurred researchers to find imaging approaches that don’t need gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs). READ MORE
MRI with Gadolinium – Better to be Safe than Sorry?
June 19, 2019
The FDA in December 2017 recommended that repeated use of MRIs with gadolinium contrast dye be minimized wherever possible, and when MRIs are taken closely together in particular. It’s like a Catch-22: an MRI can detect cancer but it can also pose certain risks -- is it better to be safe than sorry? READ MORE
READ MORE Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
C ottilio
on
Sherrie Randall
on
Rickie
on
Catina Sherman
on
Vanessa Sterling
on
Aaron Pickett
on
Laurie Penman
on
terry blue
on
Judy L McKellips
on
Robert Valdez
on
Armida Arredondo
on
Loretta carter
on
Shawn mcmurphy
on
Jamie
on
Tennessee
on
South Carolina
on
California
on
California
on
North Carolina
on
North Carolina
on
I was once a truck driver and hauled some hazmat material, but I lost that career in 1988 due to back problems. In 1988, I had the first cervical back surgery, and I had to take MRIs and x-rays. Starting in 1999, I started having lower back problems. I had more tests during this period. From 2001 to 2002, I was exposed to so many MRIs, x-rays, mylograms, discograms, 3 back surgeries - all within a 13 month period. I thought I was being put through too much, as well as my friends and family, but I was doing what the doctors said to do. We all thought I was being exposed to to much radiation.
In 2005, my wife and I were in a wreck, I had multiple x-rays and MRIs. The last MRI showed a pocket of fluid that the orthopedic said was on my spinal column. He sent me to a neurosurgeon and he said it was not on the spinal column, but did not know what it was. I saw my general surgeon who found that it was on my thyroid. He tested the fluid and it was benign. I went back every six months, this last time, it had become a goiter and consumed my thyroid.
When he went in to take it out, he tested the tissues and found papillary cancer cells in the tissue, thus, he had to remove the entire thyroid. Now, I have to take treatments in a few weeks to kill all the cancer cells that are in my body.
My wife told him about all the tests and exposure I was put in during those 13 months with back problems, and the year after the wreck. She asked him if being exposed to all these MRIs (some with dye and contrast) and x-rays, steroids, etc. would have caused it. He said it could because I had surely been exposed to a high level of radiation from somewhere.
My doctor said he caught it in time and I am thyroid cancer free, but I have to go through the treatments to take care of all the papillary cancer cells inside my body they found in the tissue. I hope we have caught it in time, and I will be completely cured with my treatments.
Now, I am afraid all this radiation I was exposed to by doctors and specialists with MRIs, x-rays, etc. have cause a cancer problem. I do not know, but it came from somewhere, and I would like to know for sure where.
Now my wife is afraid since she has had 5 MRIs since the wreck in 2005, as well as x-rays, having 2 MRIs from January 2007 to April 2007 of this year. Are doctors doing too much with all these radiation tests? Something happened to me, and now I have to deal with cancer cells that must be killed off. I am scared.
California
on