Case in point is the ongoing issue between Janet Harris—and Phil and Robin McGraw, the latter known internationally as hosts of the TV show Dr. Phil. The McGraws and Harris were, until the dig bite incident in 2009, friends. However, according to a story published in the New York Post February 3, from Harris' perspective the friendship is no more, as the dog bite victim seeks compensation from the McGraws for her pain and suffering.
Harris, a skin care specialist, was not only a friend but also a frequent guest on the Dr. Phil show. She had been over at the McGraw home previewing a freshly taped episode when the dog bite occurred.
In a statement published in the New York Post, Robin McGraw claimed that the couple's Jindo, a Korean breed, was asleep on the floor, when "she was inadvertently startled and snapped as a result. "As the photos taken at the time show, it was minor," McGraw said. "In fact, Janet stayed and visited, petting Maggie."
However, that's not how the plaintiff sees it. Harris' dog bite attorney characterizes the dog bite more as a brutal mauling, causing uncontrollable bleeding from what appeared to be a small but deep puncture wound.
The plaintiff claims that the McGraw dog had an unpredictable temperament and had bitten before.
Harris' statement of claim notes that the victim required emergency medical treatment and eventually suffered from pastuerella multocida, an incapacitating infection that required extended home nursing and eventually cost Harris her business.
According to premises liability California, a homeowner is basically responsible for the safe condition of the home, including pets that are allowed to freely roam the premises. An issue with any dog bite lawsuit would be if the dog owners were aware of a pet's prior biting occurrences, and if the guest was also aware of that fact or allegation. If so, should the dog have been allowed to remain unrestrained with a guest in the house? Was the guest aware of the risk? Is the guest or the pet owner ultimately responsible?
The injury occurred in December 2009. The lawsuit was filed February 2 at California Superior Court.
The defendants claim they paid for Harris to take a Hawaiian vacation, as well as providing their insurance information to the plaintiff, but that she never filed a claim.
READ MORE LOS ANGELESE PREMISES LIABILITY LEGAL NEWS
In rebuttal, Robin McGraw stated that "Philip and I have taken care of Janet," McGraw said in the statement published in the New York Post. "Janet is a friend and we continue to wish her well."
"A lot of people think dog bites are from some (stray) running around, and no one knows where it lives," said Nancy Hill, who sits on the board of directors for the National Animal Control Association. "That happens to some extent, but to a greater extent it's the owned dog."
Which often brings premises liability, and a Los Angeles premises liability lawyer, into play.
Los Angelese Premises Liability Legal Help
If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a personal injury lawyer who may evaluate your Los Angelese Premises Liability claim at no cost or obligation.
I don't know about you but I get startled at times, why can't a dog get startled? That doesn't mean it's OK to bite someone but I believe that this Harris person is attempting to extort monies from the McGraw's, bottom line.
It's real easy to sue a dog owner and the attorneys out there love a law suit against a homeowner. All the insurance companies want to do is make a quick settlement and "their time and money" is not worth the investigation.
I feel for Harris but I believe what the McGraw's did more than compensates Harris. Harris, grow up
ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY
Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com