According to court documents filed in the lawsuit, the plaintiffs are current and former Tyson employees at the Iowa pork processing plant either on the slaughter or processing floor. The employees claimed that although they were paid additional time for donning and doffing (“K-Code” time), the pay did not properly compensate them for the amount of time spent in putting on and taking off protective gear or related activities prior to 2010.
As previously reported by LawyersandSettlements (8/25/14), in 2010 Tyson revised its “K-Code” time to allow for 20-22 minutes of paid “K-Code” time per shift for all hourly employees. Before that revision, however, employees were paid for 4-7 “K-Code” minutes.
Employees won their lawsuit and were awarded damages and attorney’s fees, but Tyson appealed that decision. The appeals court upheld the award, finding that Tyson’s own internal study showed that employees were not paid for approximately 29 minutes of work per shift, based on employee “clock in” and “clock out” time. The appeals court also noted that Tyson increased “K-Code” time to 22 minutes without changing job responsibilities, a sign that the company had underestimated how long it took employees to prepare for a shift.
READ MORE UNPAID WAGES LEGAL NEWS
Tyson appealed to the US Supreme Court and argued in a brief that the class should not have been certified because there were differences in the amount of time employees spent putting on and taking off their protective gear.
The case is Tyson Foods Inc. v. Bouaphakeo et al., case number 14-1146, in the Supreme Court of the United States.
Donning and doffing lawsuits have been filed against various employers alleging employees should be paid for the time they spend putting on and taking off protective gear for their work.