That changes tomorrow.
A new state bill signed into law by Florida Governor Charlie Crist comes into effect on July 1. Bill 689 will require an injured person to prove that the defendant had prior knowledge about the condition that led to the accident, and that the defendant could have done something about the condition. Alternatively, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant should have anticipated the incident due to a recurring condition, such as a bathroom with a chronically wet floor or a salad bar frequently littered with fallen food.
Samantha Hunter Padgett, general counsel for the Florida Retail Association, told the Naples Daily News earlier this month that prior to July 1 it was a relatively easy ride for the plaintiff, who simply had to prove that a slip and fall had occurred.
"The burden was on the defendant to prove they had maintained the premises in a safe condition," Padgett said. "Cases will still move forward and go to court. They still have to prove the premises had a duty to them and failed. But this introduces balance and fairness. This really puts both sides on an equal footing."
Proponents of the new legislation hope Bill 689 will put an end to frivolous slip and fall cases, where defendants invariably agree to settle in order to avoid the costs associated with a trial. Rep. Gary Aubuchon (R-Cape Coral), a big supporter of the change to Florida law, noted that slip and fall cases for retailers in the Sunshine State were double the national average.
Publix did not comment, but reportedly had provided Aubuchon with average slip and fall defense costs for its stores from 2000 through 2008. The stats showed that revenues increased from roughly $15 billion to about $24 billion. Legal costs that hovered at about one percent of revenues nationally grew in Florida from seven to 12 percent of revenues.
A state Senate bill stalled, but Aubuchon pushed it in the House.
READ MORE SLIP AND FALL LEGAL NEWS
Such incidents will still happen, and injury does occur. Plaintiffs and their representatives will just have to work harder to prove negligence after July 1.
"The store is in a much better position to know how long the substance has been on the floor," said Paul D. Jess, general counsel for the trial lawyers' group, Florida Justice Association. "It's unreasonable to have them clean up every grape or banana lying on the floor within five minutes, but if it's been on the floor all day, that's negligence."