Request Legal Help Now - Free


New Roundup MDL Claimants Must Participate in Settlement Process

. By

Goal is equity for Monsanto glyphosate victims

San Francisco, CAThe Northern District of California has ordered current and future plaintiffs in the Monsanto glyphosate multidistrict litigation (MDL) who have not already reached a settlement with Monsanto to participate in a program that has been overseen by Special Master Ken Feinberg since 2019. The Order has apparently prompted Bayer AG, Monsanto’s corporate parent, to increase the settlement reserve fund by $4.5 billion.

Massive litigation

Bayer and Monsanto have faced more than 120,000 lawsuits alleging that the company failed to warn consumers that that exposure to glyphosate-based Roundup had been linked to the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, a cancer of the lymph system. Most claimants used Roundup at home, on their lawns and gardens.

Older age, being male, and having a weakened immune system can increase the risk of adult non-Hodgkin lymphoma. A study conducted by former EPA advisors reportedly also suggests that heavy exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup prior to its recent re-formulation, raises the risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma by as much as 41 percent.

The Roundup bellwether lawsuits that have gone to trial led to jury awards to the plaintiffs of $20 million, $25 million and $2.055 billion.  Thousands of individual cases have already settled. Monsanto is now trying to negotiate a comprehensive settlement of all outstanding cases and lawsuits that may be brought in the future.

The process has been fraught with false starts and allegations of bad faith from the beginning. As one plaintiffs’ attorney said during a 2020 breakdown in negotiations:

“I have clients who have cancer. They are dying and every time they die it fundamentally changes the dynamics of their case. I have an obligation to push those cases forward. Frankly, I don't think they've [Monsanto and Bayer] been honest with me in the process and I'm tired of it. I’m not angry, I just want to litigate.”

A clearly exasperated Judge Vincent Chhabria responded in kind, threatening to blow up the settlement process: “I don't care whether these cases settle. My job is not to settle cases. My job is to try cases.” 

Patience has clearly left the building.

Troubled settlement history 

Monsanto withdrew a settlement proposal in February 2021 after the Court expressed reservations. A subsequent $2 billion settlement proposal made by Monsanto thereafter was to have covered: 
  • Roundup users who had been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma but who have not yet sued and had not yet hired a lawyer to sue; and
  • indviduals who used Roundup before February 2021, but who had not been diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
In May, the California federal court rejected the proposal as “clearly unreasonable” for the undiagnosed group.

A central issue appears to be the very long latency period for development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, up to fifteen years. The proposed reserve fund designed to address future claims was to last only four years. Additionally, the Court wrote that provisions in the settlement “greatly exaggerate” the potential benefits of four years of “vaguely described medical monitoring” for those who have not yet contracted the cancer. Benefits of a compensation fund were described as “also vastly overstated” for the group of potential claimants who have yet to be diagnosed.

Ken Feinberg – a familiar presence 

The Order that compels future litigants to participate in the settlement process sets out few details about the process itself. Those making claims must submit information according to a schedule, after which the claims can be challenged, evaluated and awards ultimately made. Claimants have been told not to reach out to the Special Master. His office will contact them. They need not accept the settlement offer and may proceed to litigation.

Ken Feinberg is a familiar presence in the field of complex settlements. He oversaw the September 11th Victim Compensation Fund and the BP Deepwater Horizon Disaster Victim Compensation Fund, among others. In his book What is Life Worth?: The Unprecedented Effort to Compensate the Victims of 9/11,  Feinberg set out an 8-step process for determining how to allocate funds. Among the principles embraced by this process were:
  • The value of informed discretion in compensating claimants with the goal of keeping 85 percent of the money from going to 15 percent of the 'richest' claimant families. The process strives to narrow the gap between the largest and the smallest compensations paid to claimants; and
  • Lawsuits were to be discouraged as contrary to the spirit of the law establishing the compensation fund.
In the abstract, it sounds all very Solomonic. The wisdom of Solomon may, however, be what is required to achieve justice for those who have been injured because of their exposure to Monsanto Roundup, one of the world’s most widely used herbicides.


Roundup Cancer Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a defective products lawyer who may evaluate your Roundup Cancer claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

Eric Bjedisrredard is an internet troll for Monsanto/Bayer. He/she has been posting under this fictitious name since IARC/WHO classified glyphosate as a - 2A Probable Human Carcinogen.

In terms of Eric’s “cherry-picked” reference note that a couple of the authors of that analysis were on the EPA’s Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) for glyphosate and there’s zero evidence of “cherry-picking”, except by the agrochemical funded ACSH, a puppet front group of Monsanto.

Eric’s reference to the Agricultural Health Study (AHS) is Monsanto’s primary go-to study to hopefully persuade juries that glyphosate-based herbicides don’t cause cancer. However, Monsanto has failed to address the inherent statistical flaws of the AHS due to their being greater than 37% of those dropping out from enrollment to the second follow up.

Eric and Monsanto have yet to address the substantial difference in applicator exposure in agricultural vs. backpack sprayers. Both Monsanto and EPA data show that agriculture exposure to glyphosate is extremely low relative to those using backpack and other handheld sprayers. We need more trials to shed light on this critical aspect.

So please disregard any comments from Eric Bjedisrregard as he is clearly affiliated with the agrochemical industry.

Posted by

iam in

Posted by

I swam in the stuff for two years thinking it was safe. I landscaped a ladies yard 2006-2008, removed her grass with roundup. There is no way I will be visiting any dr.anytime soon. I have a mass by my belly button.

Posted by

Another nonsensical article regarding glyphosate . No mention of the fact that the 41% “”study”” was refuted as a cherry picked phishing expedition almost immediately after it was released. No mention of the fact that NHL have not risen even after glyphosate use drastically increased. No mention of the AHS. No mention of the WahO and the world’s regulatory agencies saying it is not a probable carcinogen. And no mention of the 160,000 paid to pottier for his less than honest efforts.


Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free