Request Legal Help Now - Free


Lawsuits Filed Over Mirena Side Effects

. By
Philadelphia, PALawsuits have been filed over Mirena side effects, alleging women who used the intrauterine device (IUD) suffered from Mirena birth control side effects. Among the complaints are that the Bayer Mirena warnings do not include information that the IUD can perforate the woman’s uterus, becoming lodged in other parts of her abdomen.

Bloomberg (1/28/13) notes that a lawsuit has been filed by Tricia Prendergast, who says she was not warned that Mirena can either move from its implant site or cause an ectopic pregnancy. Prendergast reportedly suffered complications from the IUD and required surgery to remove the device. In the complaint, filed January 25, 2013, the plaintiff’s attorney alleges that the risks associated with Mirena outweigh any benefits.

Mirena is inserted in the uterus and prevents pregnancy by releasing a synthetic progestogen. But plaintiffs allege Mirena can migrate from implant site, causing serious internal injuries, including uterine perforations, sepsis and abscesses.

The United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation met in March to decide whether or not to consolidate pretrial proceedings on Mirena lawsuits into a multidistrict litigation. Plaintiffs requested a transfer of the lawsuits to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Included in the motion were lawsuits from a variety of states, including California, Arkansas and Kentucky. Following the hearing, the panel reportedly agreed to consolidate federal lawsuits in the Southern District of New York. A date for the initial conference concerning the litigation is now set for May 17, 2013.

Multidistrict litigation allows for more efficient hearing of the claims regarding Mirena because there are several facts in common. Moreover, consolidation into multidistrict litigation prevents inconsistent rulings and eliminates duplicate efforts during the discovery phase of litigation.

Along with allegations about serious complications associated with Mirena are concerns that some advertising regarding the IUD was misleading. In 2009, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent a letter to Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (maker of Mirena) warning the company that its marketing of the IUD overstated its effectiveness.

The lawsuit is Prendergast v. Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corp., 13-00450, U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia). The multidistrict litigation is In re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2434 (JPML).


Mirena IUD Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your Mirena IUD claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

I have a mirena device that was implanted in Dec 2010. I am now having alot of itching that I think is related to the mirena because I have never had it before. What should I do?


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free