Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Sprint Fidelis Recall Costs Medtronic

. By
Minneapolis, MNMedtronic has announced that the massive Sprint Fidelis recall issued in October had an estimated negative sales impact of $130 million and cost the company $31 million in inventory write-offs and other direct costs.

Medtronic announced the recall after it received reports of at least five deaths related to fractured Sprint Fidelis leads. Instead of using Sprint Fidelis leads, doctors are now using Medtronic's Sprint Quattro leads, which are older and larger than the Fidelis leads. Meanwhile, Medtronic faces lawsuits from patients who were injured by the Sprint Fidelis leads.

The Sprint Fidelis lead is not the first defibrillator-related problem for Medtronic. The company has already announced a number of recalls because of problems with the batteries in its defibrillators. In fact, Medtronic is in the process of settling approximately 2,600 claims that argued the company hid defects in its defibrillators from the public. According to [Bloomberg,] Medtronic has set aside an additional $55 million to settle the claims, bringing the total settlement to around $130 million.

Medtronic PatientPlaintiffs argued that defects in the implantable defibrillators created life-threatening malfunctions in the devices.

Even with the defibrillator lawsuits coming to a close, Medtronic now faces lawsuits related to its Sprint Fidelis leads. Some lawsuits have already been filed in Minneapolis and San Juan, Puerto Rico, alleging that Medtronic misled consumers about the safety of the lead wires. More lawsuits will likely be filed as patients with the Sprint Fidelis leads implanted experience malfunctions in their devices. As more reports of serious injury come in, the number of lawsuits related to Sprint Fidelis leads could draw close to those related to the defective defibrillator batteries.

Based on the number of lawsuits alleging that Medtronic has hidden the risks associated with its devices from consumers, can Medtronic be trusted to put the consumer's health ahead of profits? Critics of the company claim that Medtronic waited too long to recall its Sprint Fidelis leads. They also argue that Medtronic knew well in advance of the recall that there were problems with the Sprint Fidelis leads but continued to advertise its product to the general public.

In an interview with [Minnesota Public Radio,] Dr. Robert Hauser, a cardiologist at the Minneapolis Heart Institute, noted, "We have a rule of thumb, and that is if you see three of the same thing at one center, you'd better pay attention to it, because it's not likely due to chance." The clinic stopped using the Sprint Fidelis leads after six injuries related to the leads came the staff's attention.

Meanwhile, Sid Wolf from Public Citizen is tired of the self-congratulatory attitude that Medtronic has taken. The company publicly stated that it moved as quickly as possible in announcing the recall, but it received a letter back in March warning about problems with the Sprint Fidelis leads. Furthermore, the company had reports of malfunctions in January.

On October 16, 2007, Wolf sent a letter to FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach, urging him to conduct an investigation into Medtronic's recall. He notes in the letter that a quick response to reports of injury in Sprint Fidelis patients was necessary because the longer the leads were implanted, the greater the chance of a malfunction. Furthermore, quick response would have prevented additional people from having Sprint Fidelis leads implanted. Since January, many people have had Sprint Fidelis leads implanted but would not have done so if problems with the leads had been made public. Now these patients have no choice but to wait and see if anything goes wrong with their leads.

Patients who have suffered serious shocks because of fractured leads since March would probably also agree that Medtronic did not act quickly enough after learning about problems. Some have alleged that Medtronic told them to keep the leads in and not worry about them, even after the leads malfunctioned. All say that having their lead malfunction is an incredibly painful experience and one that causes them a great deal of anxiety. It can also be life-threatening.

READ ABOUT THIS LAWSUIT

Medtronic Legal Help

If you have a Medtronic internal cardiac defibrillator and have experienced multiple shocks for no apparent reason, please contact a lawyer involved in a possible [Medtronic Lawsuit] who will review your case at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free