Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

AIG Escapes Defense Bill in Force-Placed Insurance Litigation

. By
New York, NYIt may be a legal drop in the bucket, but a New York judge has ruled in QBE Americas Inc. et al. v. Ace American Insurance Co. et al., that American International Group Inc. (AIG) escapes from having to pay defense costs for individual and proposed Force-Placed insurance class action lawsuits against QBE Holdings Inc. as the AIG policy lacks any provision for duty-to-defend.

The case, number 653442-2013, in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, relates to various accusations that QBE paid kickbacks related to Force-Place insurance, to various banks. According to court documents, QBE paid $10 million to the financial regulator of New York State related to a lenders insurance investigation, in addition to a share of the $19 million settlement in tandem with Wells Fargo Bank NA over a class-action Force-placed insurance lawsuit.

Forced-placed insurance is a form of lenders insurance a lender mandates and attaches to a mortgaged property when it is determined that a mortgagee has insufficient insurance to cover the value of the mortgage in the event of a loss or has allowed a traditional insurance policy to lapse.

Such applications of lender insurance are perfectly legal and within the mortgage holder’s rights. However, what various Attorneys General have taken issue with is a perceived cozy relationship that exists between some lending institutions and insurance companies, resulting in alleged kickback payments and other schemes hatched on the backs of homeowners.

Such Force-Place insurance is often far more expensive than traditional products, often with less coverage. Many a property owner has filed a Force-placed insurance lawsuit alleging inappropriate activity on the part of a bank and an insurance provider.

The allegations against QBE include the alleged provision of improper commissions and insurance-related services to Wells Fargo that only succeeded in driving up premiums for lender insurance.

Plaintiffs have taken exception to such unfavorable forced-placed insurance terms. Some plaintiffs have alleged in other cases that the placement of Forced-Place insurance wasn’t necessary at all, or alleged to have been placed to cover a time frame that was not appropriate.

The coverage lawsuit by QBE was brought against various parties. In her decision, New York Supreme Court Judge Shirley Werner Kornreich found that QBE’s policy with AIG gave AIG the right, but not the duty, to defend claims made against QBE.

READ ABOUT FORCE-PLACE INSURANCE LAWSUITS

Force-Place Insurance Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an insurance lawyer who may evaluate your Force-Place Insurance claim at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free