According to the November 22, 2007 issue of the Detroit Free Press, the action was applauded by the Triangle Foundation, a gay, lesbian and transgender rights organization. Sean Kosofsky, Triangle Foundation policy director, said "Granholm's move was important because coming out as transgender is a career-ender. Transgendered people lose their jobs all the time." The Triangle Foundation had advocated for the action since 2003.
James Muffet, president of Citizens for Traditional Values, said he doubted sexual identity discrimination was a serious problem in state government and it was more likely that Granholm was making a symbolic gesture for political reasons after receiving support from gay rights organizations in her re-election bid last year.
Four years ago, Granholm issued an executive directive that added sexual orientation to previously protected categories such as religion, race, color and national origin.
Muffett added, "Further protections are unnecessary and could result in absurd contradictions, such as a male employee insisting on being allowed to use the women's restroom".
Michigan's new law came on the heels of Florida's Palm Beach County's new ordinance, (approved November 20, 2007), which now also protects transgender employees.
According to the November 21, 2007 issue of the South Florida Sun-Sentinel, the Palm Beach County ordinance states "Gender identity or expression means a gender-related identity, appearance, expression or behavior of an individual, regardless of the individual's assigned sex at birth."
The protections apply when transgender individuals are buying a house, renting an apartment or when they're at a place of "public accommodation," such as a movie theater or a restaurant.
Rand Hoch, president of the Palm Beach County Human Rights Council, estimated that there are 5,000 to 10,000 people in Palm Beach County who fit the transgender category.
According to the June 1st 2007 press release issued by The Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest gay civil rights organization, all of the Presidential Democratic candidates stated their support for extending federal benefits and equal tax treatment to same-sex couples who are parties to a union legally recognized by their state. Additionally, the candidates express unanimous support for extending federal benefits for same-sex couples and their children.
The release stated, "this groundbreaking and unified position of all Democratic candidates would override Section 3 of the so-called "Defense of Marriage Act," which provides that for federal purposes, the word 'marriage' means only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word 'spouse' refers only to a person of the opposite sex who is a husband or a wife (1 U.S.C. Section 7)".
The 2008 Democratic presidential candidates responding to The Human Rights Campaign questionnaire included Sen. Hillary Clinton, Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. John Edwards, Gov. Bill Richardson, Sen. Joe Biden, Sen. Chris Dodd, Sen. Mike Gravel and Rep. Dennis Kucinich.
Only Kucinich and Gravel supported same-sex marriage (i.e. allowing civil marriage rights for same-sex couples) in addition to extending federal benefits and equal tax treatment to a union legally recognized by their state.
According to the November 8th, 2007 ABC News/Washington Post poll titled "SOCIAL ISSUES", a record number of Americans support civil unions for gay couples. Poll findings stated that, "Overall, 55 percent favor allowing homosexual couples to form legally recognized civil unions, giving them the same rights as married couples in areas such as health insurance, inheritance and pension coverage. That's up from 45 percent in an ABC/Post poll in 2006; the previous high was 51 percent in 2004."
READ MORE LEGAL NEWS
On October 31st , The Human Rights Campaign reported that when Presidential candidate Fred Thompson, during a campaign stop in New Hampshire, was asked how he felt about a federal civil unions law that would recognize such unions where they exist (such as New Hampshire), "he doesn't support civil unions, and then pivoted to discuss same-sex marriage, which he called a judge-made controversy".