Request Legal Help Now - Free


Two Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Victims Win Denied Disability Insurance Appeal

. By
Sacramento, CAIn two recent and separate incidents, two people who were wrongfully denied disability insurance won their appeals in court. Coincidentally, they both suffer from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS).

Judi Peterson had her benefits terminated by her employer, AT&T, even though she was deemed completely disabled from CFS since 2006. This May, she won her wrongfully denied disability lawsuit against her employer and insurer in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The court (in a non-jury trial) found that AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 1 ("AT&T"), administered by third-party administrator Sedgwick CMS, abused its discretion and wrongfully terminated Peterson’s long-term disability benefits. Furthermore, the court ruled that AT&T’s benefits termination was “illogical and without support in inferences that may be drawn from the facts”.

Despite the fact that her condition did not get any better since 2006, AT&T terminated her benefits: their reasoning was “lack of objective evidence”, which is a common denial tactic. Although there are no objective tests for CFS, AT&T hired three independent medical examiners from Insurance Appeals, LTD (also known as Network Medical Review or NMR) and all three made incorrect diagnoses. AT&T also used documents that didn’t reflect CFS, specifically a medical record review and a Transferable Skills Analysis test.

The court further found that AT&T disregarded the law requiring it to ensure that the reasons for the termination of benefits actually had factual support. Brent Brehm, the lead trial attorney representing Peterson, said the court’s decision illustrates that policyholders cannot always rely on an 'unbiased' third-party administrator to make logical and fact-based benefits decisions. "Denials must be carefully scrutinized, and if the conclusions appear unfair, incorrect, or ridiculous, they probably are,” said Brehm.

(See more information about Peterson v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan.)

In the second case, an Oregon court found in favor of former attorney Kenneth Ayers’ wrongful denial of benefits claim.

His employer had an ERISA-regulated health benefits plan maintained by the Life Insurance Co. of North America (LINA). Although LINA initially approved Ayers’ LTD and paid him $5,000 per month, they terminated his benefits five years later, in 2007, determining that Ayers suffered from depression and not CFS. The U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon determined otherwise.

In March 2008 Ayers appealed LINA's benefits termination, but LINA upheld its decision. Then in August 2008 Ayers was awarded a lump sum of more than $108,000 in SSDI benefits, retroactive from March 2002.

In September 2008 Ayers filed a claim for long term disability (LTD) benefits against LINA and the insurer counter-claimed, claiming that Ayers owed them $99,885 in allegedly overpaid benefits.

In Ayers v. Life Insurance Company of North America, the court ruled that Ayers indeed suffered from CFS and it had resulted in total disability. The district court found that Ayers’ documentation proved he was unable to work due to fatigue, muscle pain, sore throats, cough, headaches, poor sleep and chest pain. Although Ayers is suffering from depression, it is unrelated to CFS impairments. Medical experts testified that, although Ayers is suffering from depression, even severe depression could not result in his severe cognitive impairments. The court ruled out psychological issues at the time of his CFS diagnosis.

District Judge Ann Aiken raised another issue regarding whether LINA made fraudulent statements and commissioned false medical reports to facilitate termination of Ayers' LTD benefits. In conclusion, Ayers adequately supported his "unclean hands" defense to LINA's equitable claim asserting overpayment, and the court separately held that such a defense was not preempted under ERISA.



If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an insurance lawyer who may evaluate your DENIED DISABILITY claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

I'm currently fighting with Sedgwick who uses Network Medical Review Doctors. I was denied once for my short term disability, I fought back on legal basis that MD who did my peer review was not licensed in California. I also take exception with the very fact that my condition started 03/18/2016 when I was rear-ended in a motor vehicle accident. I persevered for 9 months seeking treatment on unpaid time off, trying to avoid Sedgwick. I'm approved thru July 17, 2016. A Sunday, which is the due date of my next Medical Evaluation. I have 2 MRIs on file from march 2015 thru March 2016. I recently had a "vertical sitting" MRI that was done on 06282016. I have a Right eccentric Annular tear and disc bulges L3-L4 L4-L5, spinal stenosis potentially impinging on the right L4 nerve root, etc....the peer evaluation did not include this information as they only give the peer MD the notes from the ONE (last) medical documentation submitted. These are the tricks they use. Be smart. Research. These cases are won takes time...but if you do the homework you can prevail. Include EVERY diagnosis and test on EVERY MD update they request.

Posted by

I have just received my SSDI award and now ATT LTD is saying I am not disabled and dies not want to pay what they promised to pay as they are ones who gave me no choice with health issues to remain working so did what they said now then they are trying to say a adminstive law judge who ruled I was totally disabled is not the same as there doctors because its private insurance and I'm losing everything I have including the ability to keep trying to fight them because they are doing so many things not correct. I need help terribly my health is not better in fact its worse since going to all these drs operations and they can't find what is causing my problems and expecting the drs to do all the work and that is causing rresentment and I am at a lost and need help.


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free