Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Cannabis Workers Retaliated Against?

. By

Three sisters alleged a cannabis farm fired them in retaliation for voicing their concerns about health and safety issues and other violations of California employment law.

San Jose, CAThree sisters—former cannabis farm workers—alleged they were fired for complaining about California labor and employment law violations. Retaliation is a serious labor law violation. However, litigation ended October 18th when a federal judge signed off on a dismissal motion filed by the Montelongo sisters after reaching a settlement agreement.

Each side agreed to settle on confidential terms and agreed to cover their own attorney fees. Plaintiffs sought damages to compensate for lost wages, including back pay and front pay, and other lost benefits.

In their federal lawsuit the Montelongo sisters said they were fired for:


Complaining about unpaid pre-shift temperature checks;
  • Inadequate social distancing;
  • Advocating for other female workers,
  • Violations of health and safety laws,
  • Violations of minimum wage laws,
  • Violations of family rights protections,
  • The proper treatment of Rachel Montelongo's disability (post partum depression) and taking time off for mental health reasons.

As well as claims of retaliation and violations of a California state labor statute they brought employment discrimination claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act .

Rachel, Alejandra, and Andrea Montelongo were hired by Valley Harvest LLC  to work at a cannabis farm operated by Nug Farms and owned by Cannabis Strategic Ventures. They worked at the pot farm just over a year-- from June 2020 until August 2020 when they were fired.  

According to their lawsuit, just before they were fired Andrea and Rachel Montelongo raised concerns about injuries they incurred after not being provided with personal protective equipment despite instructions to directly handle bleach. Also in August Rachel Montelongo left work one day to treat her postpartum depression and her sisters left with her. The next day, one of the sisters received a phone call from human resources that conveyed that all three women were fired from the farm.

Defendants’ Account


When they picked up their final checks, Alejandra was told she was fired for overwatering certain plants and Andrea and Rachel were fired for working too slowly, tardiness and arriving late to work.

The case is Montelongo et al. v. Valley Harvest LLC et al., case number 5:21-cv-00235, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

READ ABOUT CALIFORNIA LABOR LAW LAWSUITS

California Labor Law Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to an employment law lawyer who may evaluate your California Labor Law claim at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com

Request Legal Help Now! - Free