Request Legal Help Now - Free
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Actos Lawsuit Slams Takeda Pharmaceutical Executives

. By
Boston, MAA whistleblower lawsuit filed against Takeda Pharmaceuticals alleges the maker of Actos ignored concerns about potential Actos side effects, including Actos and bladder cancer, and actively promoted the use of Actos for treatment of prediabetes. A type 2 diabetes drug, Actos (pioglitazone hydrochloride) was never approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treating prediabetes.

According to court documents, the whistleblower in the Actos lawsuit is Peter P. Lawton, formerly the director of patent life-cycle maximization at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). Having left GSK’s employ in 2003 after a 20-year career with the UK pharmaceutical giant, Lawton alleges he was privy to information during a series of three job interviews with Takeda in 2009. Lawton is reported to have told a Massachusetts federal court earlier this year that Takeda executives claimed to have been paying off doctors to prescribe Actos for treatment of prediabetes.

Lawton also alleges that Takeda and its marketing partner at the time, Eli Lilly, made payments to doctors in exchange for the undertaking of so-called educational presentations and sessions touting the scientifically-proven benefits of Actos.

It is alleged that studies used for these sessions were written by Takeda.

Actos is a popular medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, at one time lagging behind sales of GSK’s Avandia before the latter fell from favor over allegations of cardiovascular issues. Actos also carries risk for Actos heart failure, but not to the degree of Avandia and thus was considered a safer alternative. Sales of Actos spiked dramatically.

Over the ensuing years, plaintiffs have accused Takeda of minimizing or withholding evidence of bladder cancer - saying that had they known about the alleged association between Actos and bladder cancer, they would have lobbied to be on a different type 2 diabetes drugs.

Lawton, who launched his whistleblower lawsuit in February 2014 and continues on his own after the federal government declined to join, alleges that Takeda executives told him they had prior knowledge that the FDA would not be approving Actos for prediabetes. And yet, according to the lawsuit, Takeda and Eli Lilly proceeded to pay up to 1,000 doctors and other medical professionals between $2,000 and $3,000 per presentation to promote off-label use of Actos.

While doctors have the legal and ethical freedom to prescribe medications off label, manufacturers do not. It is illegal for a manufacturer to actively promote and market a drug for indications for which it was not formally approved by the FDA.

The activities and conduct that lay at the root of the Actos lawsuit allegedly occurred between 2000 and 2011. “Without defendants’ off-label marketing campaign, few if any doctors would have prescribed Actos to healthy patients for the prevention of diabetes,” the lawsuit contends.

The lawsuit is Lawton v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals Inc., Case No. 1:12-cv-10797 in US District Court for the District of Massachusetts.

READ ABOUT ACTOS SIDE EFFECTS LAWSUITS

Actos Side Effects Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your Actos Side Effects claim at no cost or obligation.

READER COMMENTS

Posted by

on
We received a phone call that my husband was awarded $148,000 but my husband erased the message. Who can we
Contact to retrieve the information
Thank you

Posted by

on
when we find out what the point value is?

Posted by

on
what kind of cancer do you suppose to have I took this medication for years I have colon cancer had out a law suit but was turn down

Posted by

on
When will we see the money?

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com
Request Legal Help Now! - Free