Request Legal Help Now - Free


Takeda Loses Actos Lawsuit, Ordered to Pay More Than $2 Million

. By
Philadelphia, PAA jury in an Actos bladder cancer lawsuit has found in favor of the plaintiff, and has ordered Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. to pay more than $2.3 million. The plaintiff, John Kristufek, had filed his Actos side effects lawsuit alleging he was not properly warned about the risks associated with Actos, specifically the reported link between Actos and bladder cancer.

As reported in a LawyersandSettlements article by Gordon Gibb (2/6/15), one of the experts who testified on behalf of Takeda informed jurors that he had previously received money from Takeda in the past. The expert, Mark Schoenberg, a urologic oncologist, had testified that he believed Kristufek’s smoking and history of bladder tumors predating his use of Actos were the cause of Kristufek’s bladder cancer.

But Schoenberg also told jurors that he had received $25,000 for submitting expert testimony on Takeda’s behalf in a previous lawsuit.

The jury in the Kristufek lawsuit found in favor of the plaintiff, and awarded him approximately $2.3 million in damages and medical expenses. Jurors said Takeda exhibited “reckless indifference” to the plaintiff’s health, according to Bloomberg Business (2/12/15).

See Video on Actos Lawsuits

As of March 16, 2015, there were more than 4,100 federal Actos lawsuits in MDL 2299 before Judge Rebecca F. Doherty in district court for the western district of Louisiana, according to MDL records. In addition to the federal lawsuits, there are reportedly around 4,500 lawsuits in various state courts. Those lawsuits allege patients and medical professionals were not adequately warned about the risk of bladder cancer associated with the use of Actos.

Takeda has defended Actos saying the drug was properly tested and contained adequate warning labels. Some lawsuits filed against the company have resulted in victories for the plaintiffs, although in some cases, verdicts have been thrown out or are under appeal. In one case, a jury awarded $9 billion to a plaintiff, although that award was reduced to $36.8 million.

In a lawsuit in Wisconsin state court, a judge has decided not to issue sanctions against Takeda after finding there is not enough evidence that the drugmaker knowingly destroyed documents related to Actos. Other courts, however, have found that Takeda knowingly destroyed vital documents.

The lawsuit involved in the award is Kristufek v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc., case number 120702275, in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas. The consolidated cases are In re: Actos (pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2299.


Actos Side Effects Legal Help

If you or a loved one have suffered losses in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a drugs & medical lawyer who may evaluate your Actos Side Effects claim at no cost or obligation.


Posted by

After 14 operations after my first AMI, one of the drugs I was placed on was Actos and even though the have found that I have bladder cancer. I'm still on it!
I had to work very hard for my two Ph.D.'s. I' am starting to wonder about the structure to become of physician in this country. That may sound like rhetoric, but anger is a powerful motivator.


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free