Lawyers and Settlements
Advertisement
Home Page >> California Unpaid Wages >> Articles

California Unpaid Wages Articles

Former Marriott Hotel Waiter Appeals Dismissal of his California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit

Former Marriott Hotel Waiter Appeals Dismissal of his California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit June 18, 2018. By Lori Prapas.
San Jose, CA: Ex-waiter Ian McCray worked for the San Jose Marriott from May of 2012 to August of 2015. He claims that during that time, Marriott Hotel Services did not pay him the minimum wage required by the city’s municipal wage ordinance. The ordinance appears to provide for a waiver of the minimum wage requirement if employees agree to those terms in a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). Because McCray’s employment with the Marriott was governed by a CBA that waived the minimum wage ordinance, the hotel claimed that it didn’t need to comply with San Jose’s minimum wage laws. The court dismissed McCray’s California unpaid wages lawsuit back in March of 2017, and now the appellate court is reviewing that ruling.
Read [ Former Marriott Hotel Waiter Appeals Dismissal of his California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit ]

California State Labor Commissioner Slams Restaurants with Wage Theft Violations

California State Labor Commissioner Slams Restaurants with Wage Theft Violations June 13, 2018. By Jane Mundy.
San Francisco, CA: Despite California restaurants in the past few years receiving huge fines for California labor law violations, some employers seem to have missed the memo, or perhaps they think employees on salary aren’t entitled to overtime compensation. Or perhaps they think restaurant workers, from dishwashers to cooks to General Managers, are afraid of losing their jobs if they file a complaint. Workers at six Rangoon Ruby Burmese Cuisine chains and Kome Japanese Seafood & Buffet, however, did complain, and their complaints resulted in fines totaling more than $10 million.
Read [ California State Labor Commissioner Slams Restaurants with Wage Theft Violations ]

Potential H&M Class Action Lawsuit Over Unpaid Security Bag Checks

Potential H&M Class Action Lawsuit Over Unpaid Security Bag Checks June 7, 2018. By Lori Prapas.
San Jose, CA: A former H&M employee, Ser Lao, has sued fashion retailer H&M in federal court for allegedly failing to provide employees with correctly itemized wage statements, and failing to pay employees minimum wage, overtime, and premium pay for missed meal and rest periods. Lao’s California unpaid wages lawsuit also alleges that H&M violated California Labor Code by refusing to pay employees for the time they spent after clocking out while having their bags checked to make sure that they were not stealing merchandise. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, has now been asked to certify the class to proceed as a class action. Meanwhile, the State Supreme Court is poised to issue an epic decision on the exact same issue in Troester v. Starbucks.
Read [ Potential H&M Class Action Lawsuit Over Unpaid Security Bag Checks ]

After $7.9 Million Jury Verdict, Chipotle Settles California Labor Lawsuit To Avoid Punitive Damages

After $7.9 Million Jury Verdict, Chipotle Settles California Labor Lawsuit To Avoid Punitive Damages June 5, 2018. By Lori Prapas.
Fresno, CA: Long-time valued Chipotle General Manager Jeanette Ortiz was accused of stealing $626 dollars from her employer, but when she asked to see the surveillance footage of the alleged incident, her supervisors refused and destroyed the footage. Subsequently, she went out on medical leave for a work-related injury, and was terminated while out on leave. The pretext for her firing was the alleged theft. After a jury found Ortiz’s account of retaliatory termination persuasive, awarding her $7.9 million in damages, Chipotle Mexican Grill quickly settled the California labor lawsuit for an undisclosed amount to avoid what likely would have been a punitive damages award up to nine times as much as the $7.9 million compensatory damages award.
Read [ After $7.9 Million Jury Verdict, Chipotle Settles California Labor Lawsuit To Avoid Punitive Damages ]

CA Top Court Makes it Harder for Employers to Deny Overtime by Designating Workers as Independent

CA Top Court Makes it Harder for Employers to Deny Overtime by Designating Workers as Independent May 23, 2018. By Lori Prapas.
Los Angeles: A groundbreaking decision has been issued in Dynamex v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The Court adopted a three-part test that applies to any alleged misclassification under a California Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC) wage order. The IWC regulates wages, hours, and working conditions, and requires “employees” to be paid minimum wage, receive meal and rest breaks, and overtime pay. Now that the highest court in the state has ruled on this issue, there is a rebuttable presumption that all workers are “employees” and must be paid overtime accordingly. Workers who have been misclassified may now be more likely to prevail in a California unpaid wages lawsuit.
Read [ CA Top Court Makes it Harder for Employers to Deny Overtime by Designating Workers as Independent ]

Wells Fargo to Pay $97M to Commissioned Brokers for Rest Breaks

Wells Fargo to Pay $97M to Commissioned Brokers for Rest Breaks May 21, 2018. By Jane Mundy.
Los Angeles, CA: A Wells Fargo mortgage broker last year filed a wage and hour lawsuit alleging the bank failed to provide rest breaks, among other violations. The bank said it owed employees $25 million, but last week a federal judge agreed with its bankers and consultants: the money they were entitled to for unpaid rest breaks should be based on their commissions as well as their hourly pay, and Wells Fargo is now on the hook for $97 million.
Read [ Wells Fargo to Pay $97M to Commissioned Brokers for Rest Breaks ]

New California Ruling Easy as 'ABC' to Determine Employee or Independent Contractor?

New California Ruling Easy as 'ABC' to Determine Employee or Independent Contractor? May 10, 2018. By Jane Mundy.
Los Angeles, CA: California courts have been debating, defining and determining employment status—whether a worker is an employee or independent contractor-- since 1989. Misclassification has always been a gray area, despite California labor law holding for three decades the “Borello” standard. As of April 30, however, the new and more rigid “ABC test” is being used to identify disputes under wage orders. And experts say it will have far-reaching implications for the California workforce.
Read [ New California Ruling Easy as 'ABC' to Determine Employee or Independent Contractor? ]

Class Action Status Critical to California Donning and Doffing Wage Lawsuit

Class Action Status Critical to California Donning and Doffing Wage Lawsuit May 8, 2018. By Anne Wallace.
Los Angeles, CA: In his California labor lawsuit, Douglas Troester claims that Starbucks underpaid him by $102.67 during the year that he worked there. Chump change for Starbucks, but no one in his right mind would sue a huge multinational corporation for $102.67 -- even when that’s the grocery money – unless, of course, he or she can win and make a bigger point.
Read [ Class Action Status Critical to California Donning and Doffing Wage Lawsuit ]

Temp Worker Seeks Class Action Status for California Labor Lawsuit

Temp Worker Seeks Class Action Status for California Labor Lawsuit May 3, 2018. By Lori Prapas.
Fremont, CA: Since the California Supreme Court issued its precedential California labor law decision in Brinker v. Superior Court of San Diego County, there have been a number of lawsuits alleging violations of California state labor laws for meal and rest break violations. Now, a woman who was hired by Tesla to work in its Fremont, California factory in late 2016 claims that she was denied breaks.
Read [ Temp Worker Seeks Class Action Status for California Labor Lawsuit ]

California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit: Class Action Lawsuit Brewing Against Starbucks

California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit: Class Action Lawsuit Brewing Against Starbucks April 27, 2018. By Lori Prapas.
Los Angeles, CA: Former Starbucks employee Douglas Troester first filed this case in Los Angeles Superior Court back in 2012, alleging that he was not compensated for time spent closing the Starbucks where he worked as a shift supervisor. Specifically, he claims that Starbucks required him to clock out before transmitting information about profits and losses to corporate HQ. He also alleges that he was not paid for time he spent locking up the store, and walking employees to their cars, as was required by Starbucks’ policy at the time. Starbucks has since changed this policy, and now employees are compensated for performing these tasks. Although Troester’s California labor lawsuit relates to his employment with Starbucks from 2009-2010, if the Court finds in his favor, it could pave the way for employees to join a class action lawsuit against Starbucks and other companies with similar policies.
Read [ California Unpaid Wages Lawsuit: Class Action Lawsuit Brewing Against Starbucks ]

Page: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7     Next»