Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Stryker Accolade Hip Replacement Lawsuit

Were you looking for Stryker Hip Replacment Lawsuit lawsuits?


Attorneys are investigating possible Stryker Accolade lawsuits, alleging patients were harmed by defective hip implants. Although Stryker Accolade has reportedly been linked to an increased risk of metallosis, some studies also suggest the Stryker Accolade is linked to a risk of spontaneous dissociation, in which the femoral head comes loose from the stem. At issue may be the use of the Stryker LFIT V40 femoral head, which was used in the Accolade TMZF, the Accolate 2, and the Citation and Meridian.

FREE STRYKER ACCOLADE LAWSUIT EVALUATION

Send your Stryker Accolade claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW

Stryker Accolade TMZF

Stryker Accolade Hip Replacement The Stryker Accolade TMZF is a hip implant device made by Howmedica (a subsidiary of Stryker Corporation). Unlike other new hip implant devices, which are metal-on-metal, the Accolade TMZF is made of a proprietary blend of titanium, iron, molybdenum and zirconium (TMZF), which was marketed as being stronger and more flexible than other alloys. Some studies, however, suggest Stryker Accolade may also be at risk of failure, including dissociation of the femoral head from the stem, and metallosis.

Both the Accolade TMZF and the Accolade 2 stems use the LFIT V40, which is reportedly linked to a higher risk of taper lock failure and other problems. As a result of these issues, Health Canada issued a recall of certain lots of the device but the US Food and Drug Administration has not followed suit.

Stryker Accolade Failure

Among the concerns about the Stryker Accolade TMZF and Accolade 2 hip implant systems is the risk of spontaneous dissociation, which occurs when the femoral head of the hip implant detaches from the stem. Patients may reportedly suffer sudden, catastrophic dissociation or dislocation of the implant, even without previous symptoms of a problem. In cases of spontaneous dislocation, the patient may require emergency surgery to replace the hip implant.

Warning signs that there is a potential problem with the hip implants include pain, swelling, and reduced mobility of the hips.

In 2015, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery has recounted two situations in which patients suffered premature failure of their hip implants. The first was the story of a 62-year-old male who developed severe pain and limited mobility seven years after hip implant surgery during which he received a Stryker Accolade TMZF hip implant system. In addition to dissociation, the patient also developed substantial metal debris in surrounding joint lining and fluid (metal debris absorbed by surrounding tissue is often referred to as metallosis). The second story recounted was that of a 65-year-old male who also developed pain and limited mobility seven years after receiving his Stryker Accolade TMZF system. He was diagnosed with dissociation of the femoral head and metallosis. Both patients included in the report underwent revision surgery.

Stryker Accolade Metallosis

Metallosis occurs when metallic debris is absorbed and builds up in the patient's soft tissue. It is linked to pain, metal poisoning, and bone and tissue death. It can also cause implant failure. Metallosis has been linked to metallic debris that comes loose from metal-on-metal hip implants. A 2014 study in The Bone & Joint Journal suggests that the Trident-Accolade total hip replacement is also linked to an increased risk of elevated metal ions in the blood. Patients who develop metallosis may require revision surgery to replace their hip implant system.

Stryker Accolade Lawsuits

Attorneys are investigating potential lawsuits against Stryker alleging patients who had the Accolade implanted were put at higher risk of premature device failure.

Stryker Accolade Hip Replacement Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.


Last updated on

STRYKER ACCOLADE LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS

Stryker Hip Settlement Expanded
Stryker Hip Settlement Expanded
December 27, 2016
New York, NY: Patients who had certain Stryker hip replacements implanted but found themselves ineligible for the 2014 Stryker hip settlement received some good news. Those patients who had the Stryker ABG II Modular Neck Hip Stem and Rejuvenate Modular Neck Hip Stem implanted from 2014 to December 19, 2016, are now eligible to take part in the 2014 settlement. The announcement does not affect the Accolade TMZF, but settlements in lawsuits concerning other hip replacement devices could indicate a willingness to settle Accolade claims. READ MORE

Health Canada Recalls Certain Stryker Hip Lots
Health Canada Recalls Certain Stryker Hip Lots
November 1, 2016
Ottawa, ON: Health Canada has stepped ahead of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), in announcing a recall of certain lots of components associated with the Stryker Accolade hip replacement devices. Specifically, the agency recalled units of the LFIT Anatomic COCR V40TM and COCR LFIT femoral heads, manufactured before 2011. READ MORE

READER COMMENTS

Posted by

on
I reside in Alberta, Canada and I had my left hip replaced in 2009. The replacement was a Stryker Accolade and it failed on January 6, 2023. The femoral head broke from the stem. I had emergency revision surgery on January 10, 2023. Do I have a case for inclusion in your class action?

Posted by

on
I am a Canadian resident who had bilateral hip replacements in 2007. Stryker Accolade and LIFT V40 femural heads were used.
On November 29, 2022 I went through revision surgeries due to groin pain and blood poisoning (high levels of chrome and cobalt). In addition, I had 3 dislocations (total of five operations) due to bone decay.
Would I qualify for compensation under your pending class action?
TIA.

Posted by

on
Implant put in January 2015, came apart, removed December 2015. Could not be replaced, not enough bone structure left to replace. Parts had destroyed bone tissue.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Request Legal Help Now! - Free