Lawyers and Settlements
Share this: 
Home Page >> Potential Lawsuit >> Smith & Nephew Defective Knee Replacements

Smith & Nephew Defective Knee Replacements

Santa Cruz, CA: Allegations of knee replacement failure are being made against device manufacturer Smith & Nephew. In some cases people have filed personal injury and defective knee replacement lawsuits.

Claims against Smith & Nephew knee replacements state early failure and failure at an unacceptable failure rates. Specifically, the knee replacements are meant to last for between 10 and 20 years, but people who have these devices implanted may have to undergo revision surgery, and resulting medical expenses, pain and suffering and lost wages.

In 2010, Smith & Nephew recalled its Journey-Deuce Uni Tibial Baseplates, which rest on the tibia and attaches to the knee replacement hardware on the femur. Because these baseplates are breaking, the entire knee replacement can become compromised and unstable.

Symptoms people may experience if their Smith & Nephew knee replacements is failing include pain and limited range of motion. Most patients will require additional surgery to repair the damage.

Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please fill in our form and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Please click here for a free evaluation of your Smith & Nephew Defective Knee Replacements claim

Published on Sep-5-17


Smith & Nephew Defective Knee Replacements Under the Microscope
Smith & Nephew Defective Knee Replacements Under the Microscope
October 2, 2017
Washington, DC: When the Smith & Nephew Journey Deuce Bi-Compartmental Knee System was introduced in 2007, it was billed as “a new, innovative solution that may give nearly 70% (sic) of all patients receiving a total knee replacement a more minimally invasive, bone and ligament preserving treatment alternative,” so stated a press release issued by the manufacturer on July 9, 2007. Would such platitudes, three years ahead of a knee replacement failure recall, placate any plaintiff filing a Smith & Nephew lawsuit [READ MORE]

READ MORE [ Defective Knee Implant Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Consumer Fraud Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Defective Products Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News ]


I had a total knee replacement on my left knee in June 2015 with a smith and Nephew device. I had a revision in July 2016, because the lower part had loosened. A year later, I had to have the upper part replaced. I am now recovering from my third surgery in three years. It has been a bad experience, if I had to do this over, I wouldn't.

When I was going through rehab, I met a person that has three surgeries with weeks of mine. Same Doctor, Same Hospital and Smith and Nephew device was used

I am also checking to see if any legal action is being taken against Smith and Nephew.

Posted by Octavia Freeman on

Total knee replacement on my left knee in July of 2010 with a Smith & Nephew cobalt chrome device. I never regained full range of motion after surgery including a second surgery and a manipulation. I have been on disability since 2011. I periodically check to see if any legal action is against Smith & Nephew and found your site.

Posted by Carey Smith on


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.
Share this: 
Request Legal HelpCheck Claim StatusAdvertise With UsLegal Funding Center
FAQ | TOS | Privacy | Disclaimer | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise

View Desktop Website

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License © 2001-2018 Online Legal Media. All rights reserved.