LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION
Talcum Powder Lawsuit Alleges Ovarian Cancer Risk
Were you looking for Asbestos-Containing Talcum Powder and Risk for Asbestos Mesothelioma or J&J Faces Class Action over Talcum Powder and Ovarian Cancer Risk lawsuits?
By Heidi Turner
Johnson & Johnson has been ordered to pay $72 million in damages in a talcum powder lawsuit that alleged a link between talcum powder and cancer. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit argued Johnson & Johnson knew about the risk of ovarian cancer linked to talc but failed to warn consumers about those risks. Additionally, one talc lawsuit alleges the baby powder caused Fallopian tube cancer, leading to wrongful death. Johnson & Johnson reportedly faces 1,000 talcum powder lawsuits in state and federal courts, some of which are scheduled for court later in 2016.
Talc is a mineral often used to absorb moisture in cosmetic products. Since the 1970s, studies have suggested that talc could be linked to ovarian cancer, according to the lawsuit. Lawyers argued that Johnson & Johnson knew of those studies but put profits ahead of human life by continuing to market their talc products for feminine hygiene use.
According to the American Cancer Society, whether or not asbestos-free talcum powder causes cancer is not clear. Although many case-control studies have reportedly found a small increased risk of cancer, those studies rely on a person's memory to record talc use. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies the perineal (genital) use of talc-based powder as "possibly carcinogenic to humans."
In March, 2017, a talcum powder lawsuit was filed alleging wrongful death from Fallopian tube cancer caused by use of the powder. The complaint, Amie Cavazos, Individually and as Surviving Daughter of Rosalinda Cavazos v. Johnson & Johnson, Case No. 1:17-cv-00487, US District Court for the District of Columbia, states that Cavazos used the talcum powder from about 1978 to 2011 and was diagnosed with Fallopian tube cancer in 2013. She later died in 2015. The talc lawsuit alleges Johnson & Johnson failed to provide adequate warning about the hazardous health effects of using the talc.
In their lawsuit (Hogans et al v. Johnson & Johnson, case number 1422-CC09012-01), the family of Jackie Fox alleged Fox's death from ovarian cancer in 2015 was at least partially caused by her use of Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder. In a deposition made before she died, Fox said she used talc powder every morning until her cancer diagnosis. The family argued Johnson & Johnson was aware of the potential link between talc and ovarian cancer but continued to market the product and did not properly warn consumers that they were at increased risk of ovarian cancer.
A jury agreed with Fox's family and awarded them $72 million in damages. Of those, $10 million were awarded in actual damages and $62 million were awarded in punitive damages. This was reportedly the first lawsuit concerning talc and ovarian cancer to go to trial.
Johnson & Johnson has said studies have shown talc is a safe cosmetic ingredient.
Bloomberg Business reports that there are more than 1,000 talcum powder lawsuits filed in state and federal courts in Missouri against Johnson & Johnson and another 200 filed in New Jersey. More trials are scheduled for later in 2016.
Last updated on
En Español POLVOS DE TALCO
FREE TALCUM POWDER LAWSUIT EVALUATION
Send your Talcum Powder claim to a lawyer who will review your claim at NO COST or obligation.
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
GET LEGAL HELP NOW
Talcum Powder Allegations

According to the American Cancer Society, whether or not asbestos-free talcum powder causes cancer is not clear. Although many case-control studies have reportedly found a small increased risk of cancer, those studies rely on a person's memory to record talc use. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies the perineal (genital) use of talc-based powder as "possibly carcinogenic to humans."
In March, 2017, a talcum powder lawsuit was filed alleging wrongful death from Fallopian tube cancer caused by use of the powder. The complaint, Amie Cavazos, Individually and as Surviving Daughter of Rosalinda Cavazos v. Johnson & Johnson, Case No. 1:17-cv-00487, US District Court for the District of Columbia, states that Cavazos used the talcum powder from about 1978 to 2011 and was diagnosed with Fallopian tube cancer in 2013. She later died in 2015. The talc lawsuit alleges Johnson & Johnson failed to provide adequate warning about the hazardous health effects of using the talc.
Talcum Powder Damages
A jury agreed with Fox's family and awarded them $72 million in damages. Of those, $10 million were awarded in actual damages and $62 million were awarded in punitive damages. This was reportedly the first lawsuit concerning talc and ovarian cancer to go to trial.
Johnson & Johnson has said studies have shown talc is a safe cosmetic ingredient.
Talcum Powder Lawsuits
Talcum Powder Legal Help
If you or a loved one has suffered damages in this case, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a personal injury lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.Last updated on
TALCUM POWDER LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Tests and Studies For and Against J&J Talc - Jury Still Out
Santa Clara, CA: Despite a number of asbestos-talc lawsuits and studies to the contrary, Johnson & Johnson still stands by its talcum powder, asserting it doesn’t cause mesothelioma or ovarian cancer because their product sold to consumers never contained asbestos. J&J says plaintiffs are using attorney-driven science along with faulty studies. On the other hand, plaintiffs have brought scientific evidence showing studies linking talc exposure to cancer, adding that the giant pharma company knew the link for decades. As for the FDA, it’s still on the fence READ MORE
New Jersey Win for Johnson & Johnson and Los Angeles Mistrials in Asbestos –Mesothelioma Cancer Talc Trials
Los Angeles, CA Within two weeks of each other, two juries in California failed to reach a verdict on the same issues regarding asbestos-talc claims, resulting in two mistrials. Nine votes are needed for a verdict on claims that J&J was guilty of negligence, failure to warn about the risk of asbestos and marketing defective products. On Sept 24, the sixth J&J mesothelioma trial, the Los Angeles jury was deadlocked 8-4 against J&J – one juror short of victory for plaintiff Kirk Von Salzen. Bloomerg reported that Von Salzen, a retired computer salesman, had used J&J’s talcum powder for 30 years when he was diagnosed in 2017. He was seeking over $12m in damages. Despite the result, his attorney was “satisfied” that eight jurors ruled against J&J READ MORE
Talcum Cancer Lawsuit in California Based on Trust
Los Angeles, CA: In the sixth talcum powder-cancer trial that began last month in California, Johnson & Johnson is accused of knowing its talcum powder contained asbestos, a carcinogen known to cause mesothelioma. Plaintiff Carolyn Weirick last year was diagnosed with the rare form of terminal cancer. She claims her illness was caused by using J&J’s baby powder READ MORE

January 22, 2019
New Jersey Win for Johnson & Johnson and Los Angeles Mistrials in Asbestos –Mesothelioma Cancer Talc Trials

October 17, 2018
Talcum Cancer Lawsuit in California Based on Trust

September 10, 2018
MORE TALCUM POWDER LEGAL NEWS
READ MORE Defective Products Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READ MORE Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News
READER COMMENTS
Patricia Perez
on
Sandra K Boyes
on
Cesar aguilera
on
Judy
on
Rita sue Williams
on
New Jersey
on
Fran
on
Sheryl
on
Sherron Thompson
on
Mississippi
on
Lynda Domina
on
Andrea
on
Nate
on
I read of many research studies that have been done dating back to the 60's.
How can we put a stop to being used as corporate test subjects while being profited from?
Chavivah Witness
on
Ann Burgan
on
Amanda Davis
on
Vicki
on
New York
on
Virginia
on
Ontario
on
Massachusetts
on
New Jersey
on
North Carolina
on