Home Page Lawsuits Filed Lawsuit: Merck Faces Implanon Migration Class Action Lawsuit
Merck Faces Implanon Migration Class Action Lawsuit
A birth control lawsuit has been filed against Merck and it’s subsidiary Organon, over allegations that its Implanon birth control device migrates through the body, becoming irretrievable and exposing women who have had the device implanted to a continuing risk of potential side effects.
Approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2006, Implanon is a small, toothpick sized implant that is placed just under the skin in a woman’s upper arm. It is designed to release the progestin etonogestrel to prevent pregnancy over a three-year period. An estimated 500,000 American women have had the birth control implant inserted.
In 2011, officials in the UK reported that nearly 600 women had indicated that they got pregnant even with the birth control device. Similar concerns have been raised in the US by women who have undergone the implant.
The Implanon class action lawsuit is brought by Brook Reynolds, Robert Reynolds, Julie Reynolds, Jenni Akins, Major Akins and Ruby Ginns.
Brook Reynolds and her parents joined the lawsuit after Brook received an Implanon implant in her left arm in May 2012. In July 2014, when she went to have it removed, her physician was unable to locate it. To date, the device has still not been located in Brook’s body and is therefore irretrievable, putting her at unavoidable risk for health side effects connected with the device roaming through her body, including ectopic pregnancy and vascular damage.
Similarly, Ruby Ginns and Jenni Akins who had implants inserted in 2012, outline virtually identical stories to those of Brook Reynolds.
According to the complaint, the women and their family members claim that the manufacturers failed to adequately warn that the devices could migrate and become irretrievable.
Specifically, the complaint asserts that Merck and Organon manufactured and designed a defective medical device, failure to warn, strict liability, negligence, fraud by concealment, fraudulent misrepresentation, breach of warranty, infliction of emotional distress, and loss of consortium. The lawsuit seeks both punitive and compensatory damages. Merck Faces Implanon Migration Class Action Lawsuit Over Migration Injury Pending Against Against
Implanon Birth Control Legal HelpIf you or a loved one has suffered similar damages or injuries, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.
Last updated on
LEGAL ARTICLES AND INTERVIEWS
Implanon Lawsuits Still in Court One Year After FDA Warning Label Update
Washington, DC:March 2017 marked the one-year anniversary of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) update of the warning label of the popular implantable birth control device Implanon to include risks of device migration [READ MORE]
Court Rules Against Collecting Damages for Pregnancy After Birth Control Procedure
Portland, ME The Maine Supreme Judicial Court ruled recently that a woman who filed an Implanon lawsuit against Merck & Co. and a federally funded health center for a failed birth control procedure with an implantable device may not recover damages for an unplanned pregnancy [READ MORE]
Implanon Complaints are Not without Precedent
London, UK: For any plaintiff, or would-be plaintiff considering an Implanon birth control consumer fraud lawsuit, it would be useful to know that complaints against the implantable device (since replaced by Nexplanon) are nothing new. In 2011 The Guardian and Channel 4 News in the UK published a list of complaints that ranged from hundreds of unwanted pregnancies, to thousands of reports detailing adverse reactions [READ MORE]
MORE LEGAL NEWS
READ MORE [ Consumer Fraud Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Defective Products Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Drugs/Medical Settlements and Legal News ]
READ MORE [ Personal Injury Settlements and Legal News ]
After implanon i cant get pregnant
ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS ISSUE