Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Stand 'n Seal: Hazardous Chemicals Used Haphazardly

. By
Chicago, ILRoanoke Companies (now known as BRTT) should have acted immediately on adverse reports regarding its Stand 'n Seal Spray back when they first started rolling in. Instead, dozens of hapless consumers were inadvertently damaging their lungs, and worse.

Instead, the manufacturer chose to wait weeks until it finally notified the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), and then did so only after a physician with a Poison and Drug center threatened to contact the agency himself. (Federal law requires that a manufacturer notify the CPSC within 24 hours of determining a potential health hazard.)

Stand n Seal VictimStand 'n Seal was sold exclusively through Home Depot since 2003. For some reason, in 2005 an active ingredient was switched from one supplied to Dupont to one made by Innovative Chemical Technologies (ICT) in Georgia. It was this chemical-- Flexipel S-22WS—that initiated calls to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.

Oops! Did the makers of Stand 'n Seal simply forget that Innovated Chemical Technologies stipulated its Flexipel S-22WS chemical should never be used in an aerosol form, as it could cause respiratory injury?

The spray also contained mostly butyle acetate, an industrial solvent, and hydrocarbons, chemical compounds based on crude oil--a spray the manufacturers of Stand 'n Seal claimed to be harmless and protective clothing, including facemasks and gloves, was not necessary. Their advertisements also showed a consumer spraying Stand 'n Seal in an enclosed area, without ventilation.

But the CPSC is also under fire for not acting in a timely manner. Why was there a gap of nearly three months from the time Roanoke first received a report of an illness and the official recall by the CPSC? During this time, dozens more consumers were sickened by the spray, bringing the total close to 80, and two men later died.

The [New York Times] reported that one victim, Dr. Friedel, had used Spray 'n Seal months after the CPSC knew of its dangers. The 63-year-old physician wound up in intensive care for four days with his lungs chemically inflamed.

Why didn't the manufacturer, the retailer and the commission remove Spray 'n Seal from Home Depot's shelves?

According to the NYT, court documents indicate that the manufacturer, BRTT (formerly Roanoke) was more concerned with protecting its bottom line than with taking steps to ensure that the hazard was removed. And in doing so, countless cans of Stand 'n Seal remained on the shelves for more than a year after the 2005 recall.

READ ABOUT THIS LAWSUIT

Stand 'n Seal Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered respiratory problems from inhaling Stand 'n Seal spray grout sealant, please contact a lawyer involved in a possible [Stand 'n Seal Lawsuit] who will review your case at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com

Request Legal Help Now! - Free