Back in 1988, the FDA requested the withdrawal of oral contraceptives with estrogen levels higher than 50 micrograms because of the risk of blood clots. Yet the patch contains estrogen equivalent on average to a 56-microgram pill. Wake up, FDA!
Last month, Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization, petitioned the FDA to require Johnson & Johnson to remove its Ortho Evra Patch from the market within six months due to increased blood clot risks.
Public Citizen says that, compared with standard oral contraceptives that contain less estrogen, Ortho-Evra (norelgestromin and ethinyl estradiol) increased users' risks of blood clots as well as painful side effects such as breast discomfort, severe menstrual pain, nausea and vomiting; and the likelihood of discontinued contraceptive use.
As for the manufacturer's response to Public Citizen's request, a spokesperson for Johnson and Johnson said that "All hormonal birth control methods have benefits and risks, and the approved Ortho-Evra product label has always stated the known risks associated with its use." Not reassuring.
A case in a federal trial court in Ohio involving the Ortho Evra birth control patch alleged that the patch claimed to have "caused disaster by releasing far more estrogen into the body than birth control pills do, while its FDA approved label wrongly described the amount of estrogen it released."
The Times article also pointed out these startling facts:
- Johnson & Johnson's own internal documents showed that it knew the patch exposed users to far more estrogen each day than low dose pills.
- The FDA did not warn the public of the potential risks until November 2005 -- six years after the company's own study showed high estrogen releases. Subsequent to the FDA's warning, the sales of the patch plummeted, from 900,000 in March 2004 to 187,000 by February 2008.
READ MORE ORTHO EVRA PATCH LEGAL NEWS
It wasn't until late 2005 that the FDA required a warning that the patch contains higher levels of estrogen than most birth control pills. Lawyers for Johnson & Johnson used the FDA's warning as leverage: it responded to the warning by saying that patients should not be allowed to sue the company because the agency approved the patch and its label.
Now, Johnson and Johnson's lawyers are busy: a New York Times article reported that more than 3,000 women and their families have filed lawsuits against the company, claiming "heart attacks, strokes and, in 40 cases, death."