Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

One in Five Defibrillator Implants (ICDs) May Be Outside the Guidelines

. By
Chicago, ILAccording to a new study out Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association as many as one in five patients, or 22 percent, may have had heart implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) implanted when they shouldn't have, in conflict with the national guidelines.

Further, those patients who had the implants off-guideline had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital death and other adverse events.

ICDs can be implanted in patients with advanced heart failure to shock the heart back into a normal rhythm if it gets off track and beats irregularly. However, to date researchers have not found a benefit in implanting these devices in other patients, those who've suffered a recent heart attack, or have recently undergone bypass surgery. Consequently, the guidelines don't recommend implanting defibrillators in those patients newly diagnosed with heart failure, or in people who have very limited life expectancy.

The new study, retrospectively looked at four years of national data on from approximately 112,000 patients between 2006-2009. Lead author of the study, Dr. Sana Al-Khatib of Duke University School of Medicine in Durham, North Carolina, and fellow researchers found that the patients who received the implants according to the national guidelines had a reduced risk of death in hospital, and were less likely to suffer complications compared with people whose surgeries clearly fell outside the guidelines. The researchers found that 22 percent of the implant surgeries were in patients who fit one of the categories not recommended for the implant procedure.

Dr. Sana Al-Khatib said that while some of those implants may have been appropriate, it's likely that many were done despite the research evidence. "It's lack of knowledge. It's ignorance. It's not keeping track of the guidelines," she told MSNBC.com. "And we may have some physicians who don't agree with the guidelines or don't think the guidelines apply to their patients."

And, the surgeries are expensive, costing thousands of dollars, which raises the issue of wasted medical resources, Al-Khatib said.

Dr. Douglas Zipes of the Indiana University School of Medicine in Indianapolis, who helped write the research-based guidelines for the defibrillators, said the 22 percent rate is disturbingly high. He wasn't involved in the study.

READ MORE ABOUT Drugs/Medical
READ MORE ABOUT Malpractice
READ MORE ABOUT Personal Injury

Legal Help

If you or a loved one has suffered illness or injury resulting from these circumstances, please click the link below and your complaint will be sent to a lawyer who may evaluate your claim at no cost or obligation.

READER COMMENTS

Posted by

on
It is studies like this they cause people to die. Medicine is not an exact science. It's easy for a study to say 22 percent were inappropriately given a icd. But the reverse is that 78 % were treated appropriately with life saving devices. Hindsight is 20 20 my dad always said. I had rather err of the side of safety.

I myself have had an ICD since 2006. It did not defibrillate the first 18 months but since then it has saved my life at least 8 times when my heart began beating over 300 beats per minute. I am also thankful for the pacing device it has since my heart now paces 100% of the time.

I am only 47 years old and pray that studies like this do not deter people from getting one when needed.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com

Request Legal Help Now! - Free