Request Legal Help Now - Free

LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

Plaintiff Awarded $3 Million-Plus in Bad Faith Insurance Claim

. By
Louisville, KYIt's a case of bad faith insurance as remarkable as the deed that triggered the claim in the first place. Imagine the reaction of the insurance bad faith attorney upon learning that a doctor performed a procedure he was not trained to do. In the ensuing months various delays attributed to the insurance company amounted to a bad faith insurance claim.

HysterectomyAs recently summarized in the Louisville (Kentucky) Courier-Journal, a routine hysterectomy turned into a nightmare for Debbie Daniels when her doctor suggested he do a tummy tuck at the same time. However, according to the June 6th, 2009 edition of the Courier-Journal the doctor had never received training in the 'tummy tuck' and had also been removed from the staff of another hospital for performing such procedures without the proper credentials.

Just a few days after her surgery the plaintiff's wound burst, leaving behind a hole in her abdomen about the size of a basketball. Several surgeries followed and Daniels was placed in a medically induced coma.

The now-permanently disabled plaintiff, a former respiratory therapist in Paducah, sued her doctor. The insurance provider for the defendant—American Physicians Assurance Corp. (APAC)—hired an expert witness who told the carrier she was "appalled" at the conduct of the doctor, citing his professional behavior as "inexcusable and indefensible."

Internal documents revealed the insurer valued the plaintiff's damages at $1 million. And yet, the company allegedly stonewalled Daniels for two years, only to offer her a token $75,000.

The plaintiff later settled for $650,000 after the insurer upped the ante on the eve of the initial trial in 2006. By that time Daniels was unemployed and in the depths of financial hardship. She had two children to feed.

Thus, she took the settlement but reserved the right to sue the insurer after the fact for fostering a delay in the settlement.

She won that round. In early June a jury awarded the plaintiff $3.8 million in Jefferson Circuit Court. The verdict included punitive damages of $3,479,277. In making the award, the jury found that the insurer acted in bad faith by delaying payment when it knew its client was liable.

A spokesperson for APAC said her employer does not comment on litigation. However Ann Storberg, vice president of investor relations at the firm told the Courier-Journal that the company's policy is to pay claims when liability is clear.

Such is the world of bad faith insurance.

READ ABOUT BAD FAITH INSURANCE LAWSUITS

Bad Faith Insurance Legal Help

If you have suffered losses in this case, please send your complaint to a lawyer who will review your possible [Bad Faith Insurance Lawsuit] at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.

*Name:

Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com

Request Legal Help Now! - Free