Request Legal Help Now - Free


CDR Antitrust Update: Nine-Count Indictment Against California Firm

. By
Beverly Hills, CAThe latest antitrust news involves a federal grand jury indictment against a California-based financial products company accused of allegedly rigging bids for investment and derivatives in return for kickbacks. Antitrust lawyers will most assuredly be involved in the case, although it is not known at this time if the situation will involve a price fixing class action lawsuit.

Yesterday's issue of The Bond Buyer reported on the nine-count indictment against CDR Financial Products Inc., based in Beverly Hills. The indictments include CDR founder David Rubin and former officials of the firm who are accused of allegedly rigging the bidding process for contracts and agreements so that certain firms would submit losing bids and a specified firm would submit a winning bid in return for undisclosed kickbacks disguised as "hedge fees."

As a result of the rigged bids, "the intended winning provider increased its profits from the investment agreement(s) by paying interest to the municipality for the duration of the investment agreement(s) at a rate that was artificially low," the indictment said.

Potential Antitrust Class Action Lawsuit?

CDR is a broker of guaranteed investment agreements and derivative contracts. The indictment stems from alleged activity that is thought to have taken place as early as 1998 and as recently as November, 2006.

Rubin, together with Stewart "Zevi" Wolmark, former chief financial officer and a managing director of CDR, and Evan Andrew Zarefsky, a vice president of the firm, are scheduled to be arraigned in a federal court in Manhattan next Friday, according to their legal counsel.

The CDR case has been percolating in the public conscience for three years, ever since the offices of CDR and other GIC brokers were raided in November, 2006. The Bond Buyer reported that the Justice Department has subpoenaed numerous firms and other indictments are expected given references in the CDR indictment to four other firms and marketing agents. The latter were described generally as "co-conspirators" in the original CDR indictment, but were not named.

The indictment alleges that CDR received undisclosed kickbacks, concealed as fees that ranged in size from $4,500 to $475,000 on at least 10 occasions between November, 2001, and August, 2005.

"I would anticipate a lot more indictments down the road," said Charles Anderson, former manager of tax-exempt bond field operations for the Internal Revenue Service, who retired from the agency in January, 2007, and is now a tax-controversy consultant.

CDR has denied any wrongdoing.


Antitrust Legal Help

If you have suffered losses in this case, please send your complaint to a lawyer who will review your possible [Antitrust Lawsuit] at no cost or obligation.


Fields marked * are mandatory. Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.

*Email Address:

Your email will only be used if a response is needed.
*Your Comment:

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.

Click to learn more about

Request Legal Help Now! - Free