Comments
  • Mark Salter November 14, 2015 at 6:03 pm

    Oh my, this article is terrible. As you stated: “meaning that if a food is advertised to have 100 calories, it had better have at least 100 calories.” Isn’t this a good thing for consumers so restaurants do not put down LESS than what is actually in the food? Also, on the study published by the Journal of the American Dietetic Association, the fact that “some” foods were 200% off seems like journalism shock value. How about you tell us something more useful like the average error of published caloric values instead?

  • Leave a Reply

REQUEST LEGAL HELP NOW

Share this Page

RSS Feed

Find us on

Find us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterFind us on LinkedInFind us on Foursquare

Our Facebook Activity