Still, J&J had been brought to answer allegations of illegally marketing Risperdal by the US Department of Justice.
Specifically, J&J was accused of marketing Risperdal to children by equipping its sales force with guidance to promote Risperdal to children’s doctors as early as 2003. At the time Risperdal was not indicated for use in children and did not carry approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for such an indication.
A Risperdal lawsuit launched in 2012 by the Attorney General for the State of Kentucky accused J&J of concealing Risperdal side effects such as Risperdal diabetes, Risperdal stroke, and Risperdal gynecomastia.
The latter - gynecomastia, the association between Risperdal and growing male breasts - has proven to be a scourge amongst young males who, in spite of an active lifestyle, have been found to grow abnormally large amounts of male breast tissue to such a degree where it has to be surgically removed.
Many a Risperdal lawsuit alleges that the manufacturer knew about the risk, yet was not forthcoming with information for consumers or the health care industry. Plaintiffs and their Risperdal attorneys have noted that the association between Risperdal and male breast growth is higher - and indeed, is highest - than that which is seen in association with other antipsychotic drugs.
And yet, the complaint filed by the State of Kentucky asserted that “despite knowledge to the contrary, J&J represented to doctors that Risperdal had a safety profile unmatched by any other antipsychotic drug.”
READ MORE RISPERDAL LEGAL NEWS
J&J is said to have referenced male breast development as normal for boys as they journey through puberty. The mother of another Risperdal litigant said that the Auckland office of Johnson & Johnson told her that Risperdal does not promote male breast growth. “It doesn’t do that,” the Australian mother of an adolescent was told.
Critics - and plaintiffs with the help of their Risperdal attorney - beg to disagree.