Request Legal Help Now - Free

Advertisement
LAWSUITS NEWS & LEGAL INFORMATION

NTSB Again Calling for Airline Simulator Improvements

. By
Washington, DCThe National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been saying since the 1990s that airline simulators aren't good enough. However, the NTSB only has authority to issue recommendations. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) alone has the power to force a change that would improve the simulators pilots use to train, helping prevent the occurrence of plane crashes where there is loss of life or catastrophic injury.


Now an analysis by USA Today of federal accident reports connected to the airline industry has found that more than half of the 522 US airline fatalities since 2000 have been linked to deficiencies with simulators.

In 2001 an American Airlines jet broke apart and 265 lives were lost. The NTSB determined that the cause of the November 12 accident was the pilot's aggressive use of the rudder, which resulted from the American Airlines' simulator, which provided a false sense of how the rudders worked.

A Boeing 737-500 jet skidded off a runway in Denver at high velocity during take-off and caught fire, severely injuring six passengers aboard the Continental Airlines flight. The NTSB determined in July that the December 2008 accident was caused in part by deficient simulator training.

After the Colgan Air crash in February of last year, in which a commuter plane practically dropped onto a home in a Buffalo suburb, the NTSB ruled that while simulators may not have directly led to the crash, improvements were needed to afford pilots better training and a more accurate sense of what to expect in the case of a similar emergency in the real world of flying.

Flight simulators have been a staple of pilot training for almost 40 years and are said to have revolutionized the training industry. However, according to the 8/31/10 edition of USA Today, investigators have found simulators to be lacking. In the case of the Denver crash, in which the pilot was attempting a take-off in blustery crosswinds, the simulators made the take-off seem far easier in such conditions than they actually are.

The NTSB also found that airlines and their trainers were never informed as to the inaccuracy of their simulators.

An aviation safety consultant says that such a revelation is problematic. "It's really important to know how that data is programmed and where the holes are," said Kevin Darcy, formerly a chief accident inspector with Boeing, in comments to USA Today. "Otherwise you are fooling yourself."

The NTSB voted earlier this year to urge federal regulators to improve simulators, to the extent where they can properly instruct pilots on how to react in a real emergency.

READ ABOUT AIRPLANE CRASH LAWSUITS

Airplane Crash Legal Help

If you have suffered losses in this case, please send your complaint to a lawyer who will review your possible [Airplane Crash Lawsuit] at no cost or obligation.

ADD YOUR COMMENT ON THIS STORY

Please read our comment guidelines before posting.


Note: Your name will be published with your comment.


Your email will only be used if a response is needed.

Are you the defendant or a subject matter expert on this topic with an opposing viewpoint? We'd love to hear your comments here as well, or if you'd like to contact us for an interview please submit your details here.


Click to learn more about LawyersandSettlements.com

Request Legal Help Now! - Free