The mesothelioma cases are distinct from the talcum powder lawsuits that focus on ovarian cancer. Two reasons stand out: first, mesothelioma cancer has an extremely long latency period, sometimes as long as 50 years. The longer the elapsed time, the greater the possibility is that there was an intervening cause. J&J made that argument at trial.
Second, since the asbestos levels in talc have been monitored since the mid-1970s, winning a mesothelioma talcum powder lawsuit requires proving that 40 or 50 years ago the talcum powder in question was contaminated with asbestos. It’s hard to find samples that old. Plaintiffs had to fall back on eBay and collectors. In its defense, J&J relied on contemporaneous testing, which may have used different methodology and standards.
The causal link between asbestos exposure and talc is well established. Although circumstantial at best, the possibility that talc might be contaminated with asbestos fibers is plausible since the minerals often occur in natural outcroppings together.
READ MORE TALCUM POWDER LEGAL NEWS
Finally, in what appears to have been an attempt to mislead consumers, the company exerted pressure on its Italian supplier to stop the distribution of a booklet that revealed the discovery of trace amounts of asbestos in the talc from that mine. J&J also allegedly trained its employees to reassure anyone concerned about asbestos contamination that the substance had never been found in its baby powder.
Although the jury found for J&J in Herford’s case, there seems to be more than enough smoke to suggest fire. More mesothelioma talcum powder lawsuits can be expected.
The case is Herford et al v. AT&T Corp et al, Los Angeles Superior Court, No. BC646315.